⌘ KStart free
0%
Skip to lesson

Gastrointestinal

Anticonstipation Drugs

Match constipation therapy to stool water, secretion, propulsion, or outlet dysfunction, with current drug indications, dosing, and safety distinctions.

Soft stool that will not pass is a different problem from dry stool that needs water. Before adding another laxative, decide whether the limiting factor is stool consistency, colonic propulsion, pain associated with IBS-C, or coordination at the outlet.

Vomiting, progressive distention, severe pain, and obstipation change the task. Evaluate suspected obstruction before routine oral laxative escalation.

Find the limiting factor before choosing the drug

Constipation includes hard stool, infrequent passage, straining, incomplete evacuation, and difficult expulsion. A stool-frequency number alone does not identify the mechanism. Review the onset, stool form, pain, medication changes, fiber intake, mobility, and secondary causes. Opioids, anticholinergics, iron, and calcium are common contributors. New bleeding, anemia, weight loss, a mass, or an abrupt unexplained change requires evaluation rather than routine escalation. [1] [2]

Chronic idiopathic constipation, or CIC, is not synonymous with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, or IBS-C. Recurrent abdominal pain associated with defecation or altered stool pattern is central to IBS. A drug can improve stool frequency without adequately treating the pain component. Conversely, a person with little pain and hard stool does not automatically have IBS-C and should not receive an IBS-C-specific drug solely because constipation is present. [3]

Slow transit describes delayed colonic passage. A defecatory disorder describes impaired evacuation, often from inappropriate pelvic-floor or anal coordination during attempted defecation. These can coexist. A patient needing digital maneuvers to pass already-soft stool deserves outlet assessment. The 2026 AGA update emphasizes anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion testing, and indicated biofeedback before labeling most patients as refractory. [2]

Lumen

Psyllium holds water in bulk. PEG retains water osmotically. Docusate changes stool surface tension.

Apical epithelium

Lubiprostone promotes chloride secretion. GC-C agonists increase cyclic GMP and CFTR secretion. Tenapanor reduces sodium absorption through NHE3 inhibition.

Enteric motor signaling

Prucalopride activates 5-HT4 signaling and supports propulsive colonic contractions.

Anorectal outlet

Biofeedback retrains evacuation coordination when dyssynergia is established. Increasing luminal water alone does not correct the coordination defect.

Compare targets simultaneously. A luminal treatment can soften stool while an outlet problem remains unresolved.

Bulk, retained water, and stimulation are different tools

Psyllium adds hydrated bulk

For a patient with low dietary fiber and no obstructive or swallowing concern, psyllium is a reasonable initial option. Adequate fluid is essential: the reviewed psyllium powder instructions require at least 8 ounces (240 mL) with each dose. Introduce it with attention to bloating and adherence. Fiber is not an instruction to drink without limit when a patient has a prescribed fluid restriction; individualize the plan. Psyllium is poorly suited to suspected obstruction, significant narrowing, dysphagia, or a patient unable to take the required liquid safely. [1] [11]

PEG retains water without bacterial fermentation

Polyethylene glycol is an osmotic laxative with strong guideline support for adult CIC. It is often a practical choice after inadequate fiber response. A common adult regimen is PEG 3350, 17 g once daily, adjusted to effect. This everyday regimen is different from the large-volume solutions used for bowel preparation. Excess effect can still cause diarrhea or bloating; dose and formulation matter. [1]

Lactulose also retains luminal water but is fermented by colonic bacteria, so gas and bloating can limit tolerability. Magnesium salts are osmotic agents with an additional systemic risk when renal clearance is impaired. The CIC guideline suggests magnesium oxide with caution and advises avoiding it in renal insufficiency because of hypermagnesemia risk. “Osmotic” is a mechanism family, not a guarantee that every member has identical safety. [1]

Stimulants add secretion and propulsion

Bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, and senna can produce cramping, urgency, or diarrhea. Bisacodyl or sodium picosulfate has strong guideline support for short-term use or rescue; senna has a conditional recommendation. Longer supervised use may be reasonable, although long-term evidence is less complete. Do not convert that evidence limitation into a blanket claim that every appropriately used stimulant inevitably damages the colon. Start with a dose the patient can tolerate and reassess the actual response. [1]

Docusate is a surfactant stool softener. Its familiar name should not be confused with strong evidence for established chronic constipation. It was not supported by adequate data for a substantive recommendation in the 2023 CIC guideline. A randomized hospice trial found no meaningful benefit from adding docusate to sennosides in that studied population. This does not prove zero benefit in every setting; it does argue against reflexively treating it as the most effective default. [1] [10]

Secretion and sodium absorption offer different prescription targets

Lubiprostone is described in its label as a locally acting chloride-channel activator, with ClC-2-mediated chloride-rich secretion. Water follows into the lumen. Adult CIC and opioid-induced constipation associated with chronic noncancer pain use 24 mcg twice daily; the OIC indication also includes pain related to prior cancer or its treatment when frequent opioid-dose escalation is not required. IBS-C in women aged at least 18 years uses 8 mcg twice daily. Take it with food and water to reduce nausea. Severe diarrhea, suspected obstruction, and hepatic impairment require attention to the label's restrictions and dosing guidance. Effectiveness for opioid-induced constipation with methadone has not been established. [4]

Linaclotide and plecanatide activate guanylate cyclase-C on the intestinal epithelium. Increased intracellular cyclic GMP promotes CFTR-mediated chloride and bicarbonate secretion, increasing water and transit. Their shared receptor does not make their doses, food instructions, or pediatric restrictions identical. For adults with CIC who do not respond to OTC agents, the 2023 guideline strongly recommends linaclotide or plecanatide; lubiprostone has a conditional recommendation. IBS-C has its own evidence assessment: the 2022 AGA guideline strongly recommends linaclotide and conditionally recommends plecanatide, tenapanor, and lubiprostone. These strengths do not establish a head-to-head efficacy ranking. [1] [3] Severe diarrhea calls for suspending treatment and rehydration. [5] [6]

Read the age and indication together

Linaclotide, May 2026 label has adult CIC and IBS-C indications, IBS-C from age 7, and pediatric functional constipation from age 2. It is contraindicated below age 2. Adult IBS-C uses 290 mcg daily; pediatric IBS-C uses 145 mcg daily; pediatric functional constipation uses 72 mcg daily. Adult CIC uses 145 mcg or 72 mcg daily according to presentation and tolerability.

Plecanatide is labeled for adult CIC and IBS-C at 3 mg daily. It is contraindicated below age 6 and should be avoided from age 6 to under 18. Its pediatric restriction must not be copied onto linaclotide or vice versa.

Linaclotide is taken on an empty stomach at least 30 minutes before a meal; plecanatide may be taken with or without food. Both require a patent gastrointestinal lumen. The clinical indication and tolerability determine selection, not a numerical comparison between milligrams and micrograms of different molecules. [5] [6]

Tenapanor inhibits the sodium/hydrogen exchanger NHE3 at the apical intestinal surface. Less sodium is absorbed, so more sodium and water remain in the lumen. IBSRELA is indicated for adult IBS-C at 50 mg twice daily immediately before breakfast or the first meal and dinner. It is not a 5-HT4 prokinetic or a direct ammonia binder. The label contraindicates use below age 6, advises avoidance from age 6 to under 12, and states that pediatric safety and effectiveness below 18 are unestablished. Severe diarrhea requires suspension and rehydration. [7]

Propulsion can improve while evacuation still fails

Prucalopride is a selective 5-HT4 agonist for adult CIC. It promotes enteric signaling and colonic high-amplitude propagating contractions. It is a guideline-supported option after inadequate response to OTC agents, including in an appropriate slow-transit presentation. A normal outlet assessment helps avoid attributing every difficult evacuation to weak colonic propulsion. [1] [8]

Prucalopride is contraindicated with intestinal perforation or obstruction, obstructive ileus, and severe inflammatory intestinal conditions such as Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, or toxic megacolon/megarectum. The usual adult dose is 2 mg once daily. Severe renal impairment with creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min requires 1 mg once daily; avoid use in end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Headache, nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea are common adverse effects. The label also requires monitoring for new or worsening depression or suicidal thoughts and behavior, with immediate discontinuation and contact with the clinician if these emerge. A causal relationship has not been established; that uncertainty does not cancel the warning. [8]

Documented dyssynergic defecation needs pelvic-floor biofeedback rather than endless additions of secretagogues. Soft stool, prolonged straining, incomplete evacuation, and abnormal balloon expulsion can point toward this problem. Drug treatment may still help stool consistency, but it does not teach coordinated relaxation during evacuation. Reassess a failed regimen by asking what improved and what did not. [2]

Lactulose has an additional role in hepatic encephalopathy

In cirrhosis with hepatic encephalopathy, bacterial fermentation of lactulose acidifies colonic contents. Lower pH favors conversion of diffusible NH3 to less readily absorbed NH4+, and increased stool passage increases fecal nitrogen elimination. This is a colon-mediated effect, not direct binding of ammonia in blood. Docusate and tenapanor do not reproduce this established therapeutic role. [9]

For maintenance after an overt episode, titrate lactulose toward two to three soft stools daily while following the clinical state. More watery stool is not necessarily more benefit. Excess dosing can cause dehydration and electrolyte problems that themselves precipitate encephalopathy. Evaluate infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, sedatives, constipation, and other triggers; do not treat only a serum ammonia value. Acute encephalopathy also requires assessment of airway safety and the appropriate route of treatment. [9]

Define success before adding the next agent

Use a measurable goal such as comfortable passage of soft formed stool, less straining, or improvement in the abdominal pain and bowel pattern of IBS-C. Medication administration frequency is not the same as a stool target. PEG, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride commonly use once-daily regimens; lubiprostone and tenapanor use twice-daily regimens for the indications described here. Lactulose for encephalopathy is titrated to clinical response and stool consistency. [1] [4] [7] [9]

Review renal function, hydration, age, comorbidities, and current stool consistency before escalation. New severe diarrhea means assess volume and electrolytes and suspend the responsible secretory drug when indicated. New vomiting and distention means reconsider obstruction. Persistent difficult passage of soft stool means reconsider the outlet. An adverse effect or a diagnostic mismatch should not automatically be answered with another prescription.

Low fiber with safe swallowing suggests hydrated bulk. Persistent hard stool suggests a retained-water strategy. IBS-C pain may justify an indication-specific epithelial agent. Refractory CIC may justify secretion or 5-HT4 therapy. An abnormal outlet needs retraining. Suspected obstruction needs evaluation.

Choose the mechanism that fits

Case 1

A 42-year-old woman reports hard stools twice weekly for six months. Dietary fiber is low, swallowing is normal, and there is no bleeding, weight loss, vomiting, or distention. Which initial option best addresses the identified contributor?

Show answer and explanations for case 1
  1. A. Psyllium with adequate liquid (Best answer)

    Hydrated bulk addresses low fiber in a patient without obstructive or swallowing concerns.

  2. B. Begin tenapanor (Why this does not fit)

    Tenapanor is indicated for adult IBS-C; this low-fiber history without a recurrent pain phenotype does not establish that indication.

  3. C. Use docusate alone (Why this does not fit)

    Docusate does not correct low fiber as directly and lacks the supporting CIC evidence of other commonly used agents.

  4. D. Begin prucalopride (Why this does not fit)

    Prucalopride is supported after inadequate response to OTC therapy; this modifiable low-fiber contributor has not yet been addressed.

Takeaway: Choose a low-complexity treatment that matches the phenotype.

Case sources: [1] [11]

Case 2

A 77-year-old man with a known esophageal stricture wants to swallow dry psyllium powder because he dislikes drinking liquids. What is the best response?

Show answer and explanations for case 2
  1. A. Swallow the powder and then sip liquid gradually over the next hour (Why this does not fit)

    Psyllium powder must be mixed with adequate liquid before administration; delayed drinking does not resolve the immediate swallowing risk.

  2. B. Use a smaller dry dose and observe for symptoms (Why this does not fit)

    A smaller dose does not make dry expanding powder appropriate for a patient with a known stricture.

  3. C. Mix the powder into a thick paste using a small sip of water (Why this does not fit)

    The required liquid and known dysphagia must be addressed; a concentrated paste is not an adequate safety correction.

  4. D. Avoid this administration and select a safer individualized plan (Best answer)

    Bulk powder requires sufficient liquid and can obstruct in a patient with swallowing difficulty.

Takeaway: Bulk therapy needs safe swallowing and appropriate fluid.

Case sources: [11]

Case 3

A 54-year-old man with CIC has hard stools despite an adequate trial of psyllium and fluid. He has little abdominal pain, normal renal function, and no alarm features. Which next option has strong guideline support?

Show answer and explanations for case 3
  1. A. Tenapanor (Why this does not fit)

    This has an adult IBS-C indication, whereas the clinical question is established CIC without a prominent pain phenotype.

  2. B. Lactulose (Why this does not fit)

    Lactulose is an option after failure or intolerance of other OTC therapies but has a conditional recommendation, unlike the strong recommendation for PEG.

  3. C. Polyethylene glycol (Best answer)

    PEG is a strongly recommended osmotic therapy for adult CIC.

  4. D. Docusate (Why this does not fit)

    A familiar stool softener does not have the supporting CIC trial evidence needed to match PEG in this question.

Takeaway: After inadequate fiber response, a retained-water strategy can fit CIC.

Case sources: [1]

Case 4

A 35-year-old woman with IBS-C has more frequent stools on PEG but still has recurrent abdominal pain related to defecation. Which medication offers an indicated GC-C strategy?

Show answer and explanations for case 4
  1. A. Magnesium oxide (Why this does not fit)

    It is an osmotic salt rather than a GC-C agonist.

  2. B. Linaclotide (Best answer)

    It targets epithelial GC-C and is indicated for IBS-C.

  3. C. Prucalopride (Why this does not fit)

    This is a 5-HT4 agonist for adult CIC, not the requested GC-C drug.

  4. D. Docusate (Why this does not fit)

    Surface activity does not provide a GC-C strategy for the persistent IBS-C phenotype.

Takeaway: Stool frequency and global IBS-C response are different outcomes.

Case sources: [3] [5]

Case 5

A 73-year-old woman with prior abdominal surgery has two days of colicky pain, progressive distention, vomiting, and inability to pass stool or gas. Which action is most appropriate?

Show answer and explanations for case 5
  1. A. Withhold routine oral laxative escalation and urgently evaluate for obstruction (Best answer)

    The symptom cluster raises concern for mechanical obstruction.

  2. B. Start linaclotide and assess stool response before imaging (Why this does not fit)

    Known or suspected mechanical obstruction is a contraindication; a therapeutic trial should not delay evaluation.

  3. C. Add psyllium with adequate liquid and reassess the following day (Why this does not fit)

    Even correctly hydrated bulk is unsuitable when the present symptoms suggest an obstructed lumen.

  4. D. Give a stimulant laxative as outpatient rescue therapy (Why this does not fit)

    This acute obstructive pattern requires urgent diagnosis rather than escalation of routine constipation treatment.

Takeaway: Establish the cause of obstipation before treating it as routine constipation.

Case sources: [5] [7] [11]

Case 6

A 68-year-old man with eGFR 19 mL/min/1.73 m² asks for daily magnesium oxide after PEG was recommended. What is the main additional concern?

Show answer and explanations for case 6
  1. A. Fermentation-related gas is the main renal-specific hazard (Why this does not fit)

    Fermentation explains lactulose intolerance; the additional renal issue with magnesium is accumulation of the absorbed fraction.

  2. B. The absorbed magnesium fraction is too small to matter clinically (Why this does not fit)

    Even partial absorption can be important when severely impaired kidneys cannot clear the load.

  3. C. The osmotic mechanism makes magnesium and PEG equally appropriate in severe kidney disease (Why this does not fit)

    A shared osmotic effect does not imply identical systemic handling or renal safety.

  4. D. Magnesium accumulation from impaired renal clearance (Best answer)

    The CIC guideline advises avoiding magnesium oxide in renal insufficiency.

Takeaway: Osmotic agents do not share identical renal safety.

Case sources: [1]

Case 7

A 47-year-old woman has marked gas and bloating on lactulose for CIC and wants another osmotic option. Which choice best avoids bacterial fermentation as the mechanism?

Show answer and explanations for case 7
  1. A. Docusate (Why this does not fit)

    It is a surfactant, not the requested osmotic alternative.

  2. B. Prucalopride (Why this does not fit)

    It targets motor signaling, not osmotic water retention.

  3. C. PEG (Best answer)

    It retains luminal water without relying on colonic bacterial fermentation.

  4. D. More lactulose at a higher dose (Why this does not fit)

    That may increase the same fermentation-related problem.

Takeaway: Distinguish osmotic mechanism from fermentation-related tolerability.

Case sources: [1]

Case 8

A 39-year-old woman starts lubiprostone for CIC and asks how secretion increases. Which mechanism matches its label?

Show answer and explanations for case 8
  1. A. Activation of epithelial guanylate cyclase-C (Why this does not fit)

    GC-C agonism describes linaclotide and plecanatide, rather than the labeled chloride-channel mechanism of lubiprostone.

  2. B. Activation of epithelial chloride channels (Best answer)

    Chloride-rich secretion draws water into the lumen.

  3. C. Inhibition of epithelial NHE3 sodium uptake (Why this does not fit)

    This is tenapanor's target, not lubiprostone's labeled chloride-channel mechanism.

  4. D. Activation of enteric 5-HT4 receptors (Why this does not fit)

    This describes prucalopride-mediated propulsion rather than lubiprostone-mediated secretion.

Takeaway: Lubiprostone is a chloride-channel activator.

Case sources: [4] [5] [7] [8]

Case 9

A 51-year-old woman taking lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily for CIC has nausea after taking it on an empty stomach. What is the most appropriate first administration adjustment?

Show answer and explanations for case 9
  1. A. Take it with food and water (Best answer)

    This can reduce the labeled nausea adverse effect.

  2. B. Crush the capsule into dry powder (Why this does not fit)

    Capsules should be swallowed intact; this does not address labeled administration.

  3. C. Take both daily doses together before breakfast (Why this does not fit)

    Combining doses is not the labeled twice-daily regimen and does not address food-related tolerability.

  4. D. Take the medicine while fasting to reduce nausea (Why this does not fit)

    The label specifically favors food and water to reduce nausea.

Takeaway: Food and water can improve lubiprostone tolerability.

Case sources: [4]

Case 10

A 44-year-old man takes linaclotide for CIC. Which intracellular signal links its receptor to increased CFTR-mediated anion secretion?

Show answer and explanations for case 10
  1. A. Cyclic AMP (Why this does not fit)

    CFTR can be regulated through other pathways, but epithelial GC-C generates cyclic GMP in this drug mechanism.

  2. B. Inositol trisphosphate (Why this does not fit)

    This is a different second-messenger pathway and is not the GC-C signal identified in the label.

  3. C. Diacylglycerol (Why this does not fit)

    Diacylglycerol signaling does not identify the guanylate cyclase receptor response to linaclotide.

  4. D. Cyclic GMP (Best answer)

    GC-C activation increases intracellular cyclic GMP.

Takeaway: GC-C connects cyclic GMP to epithelial secretion.

Case sources: [5]

Case 11

A 32-year-old woman with IBS-C is prescribed tenapanor. Which epithelial change best explains its effect?

Show answer and explanations for case 11
  1. A. Increased propulsion through 5-HT4 receptor activation (Why this does not fit)

    This is prucalopride's motor mechanism rather than the NHE3 effect of tenapanor.

  2. B. Increased anion secretion through GC-C activation (Why this does not fit)

    Linaclotide and plecanatide use that receptor; tenapanor reduces sodium absorption.

  3. C. Reduced sodium absorption through NHE3 inhibition (Best answer)

    More luminal sodium and water increase stool water.

  4. D. Chloride-channel activation without inhibition of sodium uptake (Why this does not fit)

    This describes a secretagogue strategy rather than tenapanor's inhibition of NHE3.

Takeaway: Tenapanor retains sodium and water by reducing absorption.

Case sources: [4] [5] [7] [8]

Case 12

A 48-year-old woman with IBS-C is starting IBSRELA. Which schedule matches the adult label?

Show answer and explanations for case 12
  1. A. 50 mg three times daily to achieve three stools (Why this does not fit)

    Administration count is not a stool target.

  2. B. 50 mg twice daily immediately before breakfast or the first meal and dinner (Best answer)

    The drug is administered before those meals.

  3. C. 50 mg once daily before breakfast (Why this does not fit)

    The adult IBSRELA regimen is twice daily rather than once daily.

  4. D. 50 mg twice daily immediately after breakfast and dinner (Why this does not fit)

    The label directs administration immediately before those meals, not after them.

Takeaway: Keep dosing frequency separate from bowel-response goals.

Case sources: [7]

Case 13

A 9-year-old girl has functional constipation despite an appropriate initial treatment program. A pediatric clinician considers linaclotide. Which statement matches the May 2026 label?

Show answer and explanations for case 13
  1. A. Functional constipation is an indication from age 2, with 72 mcg daily (Best answer)

    The current label includes this pediatric indication and dose.

  2. B. Functional constipation is labeled only from age 6, at 72 mcg daily (Why this does not fit)

    That reflects an older pediatric boundary; the May 2026 label extends functional-constipation treatment to age 2 and older.

  3. C. Functional constipation uses 145 mcg daily in this child (Why this does not fit)

    The labeled pediatric functional-constipation dose is 72 mcg, whereas 145 mcg is used for pediatric IBS-C from age 7.

  4. D. Functional constipation uses 290 mcg daily in this child (Why this does not fit)

    That is the adult IBS-C dose, not the pediatric functional-constipation dose.

Takeaway: Age, indication, and dose must be read together.

Case sources: [5]

Case 14

A 10-year-old boy with IBS-C is being evaluated for prescription therapy. Which comparison of GC-C agents is accurate?

Show answer and explanations for case 14
  1. A. Both agents have a labeled IBS-C indication from age 7 (Why this does not fit)

    Linaclotide does, but plecanatide remains an adult treatment with avoidance advised below age 18.

  2. B. Plecanatide can be used from age 6 because its absolute contraindication ends then (Why this does not fit)

    Its label separately advises avoiding use from age 6 to under 18 despite the narrower absolute contraindication.

  3. C. Linaclotide is labeled for pediatric functional constipation but not pediatric IBS-C (Why this does not fit)

    The current label also includes IBS-C from age 7, at an indication-specific dose.

  4. D. Linaclotide has an IBS-C indication from age 7, while plecanatide should be avoided below 18 (Best answer)

    Their pediatric labeling differs despite a shared receptor.

Takeaway: Shared pharmacology does not imply shared pediatric labeling.

Case sources: [5] [6]

Case 15

A 64-year-old woman has slow-transit CIC despite PEG and stimulant rescue. Anorectal testing is normal, and obstruction has been excluded. Which drug most directly targets propulsive motor activity?

Show answer and explanations for case 15
  1. A. Lubiprostone (Why this does not fit)

    Lubiprostone increases epithelial secretion, whereas the requested direct motor target is 5-HT4 signaling.

  2. B. Linaclotide (Why this does not fit)

    GC-C activation increases secretion and transit, but it is not the direct enteric 5-HT4 motor mechanism asked for here.

  3. C. Prucalopride (Best answer)

    Selective 5-HT4 agonism promotes colonic propulsive contractions.

  4. D. Docusate (Why this does not fit)

    Docusate changes stool surface tension rather than directly promoting propulsive colonic contractions.

Takeaway: Choose a motor target when propulsion is the documented deficit.

Case sources: [1] [4] [5] [8]

Case 16

A 70-year-old woman with CIC has creatinine clearance of 24 mL/min and is not on dialysis. If prucalopride is selected, which dose fits the label?

Show answer and explanations for case 16
  1. A. 1 mg every other day (Why this does not fit)

    The labeled reduction for this nondialysis patient is 1 mg each day, not alternate-day dosing.

  2. B. 1 mg once daily (Best answer)

    Severe renal impairment below 30 mL/min requires dose reduction.

  3. C. 2 mg once daily (Why this does not fit)

    This is the usual adult regimen before the adjustment required for creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min.

  4. D. 1 mg twice daily (Why this does not fit)

    This still supplies 2 mg daily, twice the labeled daily amount for severe renal impairment.

Takeaway: Prucalopride dosing depends on renal function.

Case sources: [8]

Case 17

A 36-year-old woman develops new depression and suicidal thoughts within two weeks of starting prucalopride. Which medication action is appropriate alongside urgent clinical support?

Show answer and explanations for case 17
  1. A. Stop prucalopride and contact the clinician immediately (Best answer)

    The label directs discontinuation and assessment when these symptoms emerge.

  2. B. Continue the current dose while arranging a later causality assessment (Why this does not fit)

    The label calls for immediate discontinuation and clinician contact when new suicidal symptoms emerge.

  3. C. Reduce the dose and wait for the next scheduled visit (Why this does not fit)

    Dose reduction and delayed review do not satisfy the labeled stopping and immediate-contact instruction.

  4. D. Continue treatment because the warning does not establish causation (Why this does not fit)

    Uncertain causality does not remove the label's need for immediate action and clinical support.

Takeaway: An unproven causal relationship does not cancel a labeled stopping rule.

Case sources: [8]

Case 18

A 45-year-old man passes soft stool only after prolonged straining and digital assistance. Manometry and balloon expulsion testing support dyssynergic defecation. Which treatment best addresses the mechanism?

Show answer and explanations for case 18
  1. A. Increase PEG as the sole intervention (Why this does not fit)

    More luminal water may change consistency but does not correct the documented outlet coordination problem.

  2. B. Start a secretagogue before offering outlet therapy (Why this does not fit)

    A secretagogue may soften stool further, but the abnormal anorectal tests support targeted retraining.

  3. C. Start prucalopride as the primary correction (Why this does not fit)

    Promoting colonic propulsion does not directly retrain the dyssynergic pelvic-floor and anal response.

  4. D. Pelvic-floor biofeedback (Best answer)

    The abnormal manometry and balloon expulsion identify an outlet coordination problem that biofeedback directly addresses.

Takeaway: Soft stool can still meet an uncoordinated outlet.

Case sources: [2]

Case 19

A 59-year-old man with cirrhosis develops confusion and asterixis after several days without stool. Infection, bleeding, and sedative exposure are also being assessed. Which treatment has an established colon-mediated encephalopathy role?

Show answer and explanations for case 19
  1. A. Tenapanor (Why this does not fit)

    NHE3 inhibition is not established therapy for overt hepatic encephalopathy.

  2. B. Psyllium alone (Why this does not fit)

    Bulk formation is not the specific established treatment for this presentation.

  3. C. Lactulose (Best answer)

    Fermentation acidifies the colon, favors ammonium trapping, and increases fecal nitrogen elimination.

  4. D. Docusate (Why this does not fit)

    Surface activity does not reproduce this ammonia-handling mechanism.

Takeaway: Lactulose treats more than stool hardness in hepatic encephalopathy.

Case sources: [9]

Case 20

A 61-year-old woman receiving maintenance lactulose after hepatic encephalopathy has seven watery stools daily, dizziness, and sodium of 149 mmol/L. What should guide the next step?

Show answer and explanations for case 20
  1. A. Continue the same lactulose dose because stool frequency indicates adequate treatment (Why this does not fit)

    Seven watery stools with hypernatremia and dizziness indicate excessive catharsis rather than the desired maintenance response.

  2. B. Reassess and reduce excessive catharsis while correcting dehydration (Best answer)

    The usual target is two to three soft stools, not dehydrating diarrhea.

  3. C. Increase lactulose until serum ammonia normalizes (Why this does not fit)

    Clinical status and two to three soft stools guide maintenance; more diarrhea can worsen dehydration and encephalopathy.

  4. D. Add a stimulant laxative while replacing fluids (Why this does not fit)

    Additional catharsis would aggravate the active adverse effect rather than correct the dose-response problem.

Takeaway: Excess lactulose can create a new encephalopathy precipitant.

Case sources: [9]

Case 21

A 50-year-old man uses PEG for CIC and wants an occasional rescue agent after a missed response. He has no obstruction or alarm symptoms. Which statement about bisacodyl is accurate?

Show answer and explanations for case 21
  1. A. It has guideline support for short-term or rescue use, with cramps and diarrhea as tradeoffs (Best answer)

    This matches the recommendation and predictable adverse effects.

  2. B. It should be avoided for rescue because long-term trial data are limited (Why this does not fit)

    Limited long-term evidence does not negate the strong recommendation for short-term or rescue use.

  3. C. It works primarily by lowering stool surface tension (Why this does not fit)

    That describes a surfactant such as docusate, whereas bisacodyl stimulates secretion and motility.

  4. D. It must replace PEG rather than being used as occasional rescue (Why this does not fit)

    The guideline permits rescue treatment in combination with other constipation agents.

Takeaway: Stimulants have a legitimate role without promising unlimited tolerability.

Case sources: [1]

Case 22

A 57-year-old woman continues to have troublesome CIC on docusate. She believes its common use proves it is more effective than PEG. Which explanation is best supported?

Show answer and explanations for case 22
  1. A. The hospice trial establishes that docusate is ineffective in every constipation population (Why this does not fit)

    That exceeds what a short trial in a specific hospice population can show.

  2. B. Common prescribing is sufficient evidence to favor docusate over PEG (Why this does not fit)

    Frequency of use does not replace comparative trial evidence or guideline assessment.

  3. C. The CIC guideline establishes that every prescription agent is superior to PEG (Why this does not fit)

    Its recommendations were largely based on placebo comparisons and do not create a universal efficacy ranking.

  4. D. Docusate has limited supporting evidence; PEG has a strong CIC recommendation (Best answer)

    Familiarity should not substitute for comparative evidence.

Takeaway: Distinguish limited evidence from universal ineffectiveness.

Case sources: [1] [10]

Case 23

A 41-year-old woman begins plecanatide and develops profuse watery diarrhea with orthostatic dizziness. Which immediate medication response matches its label?

Show answer and explanations for case 23
  1. A. Reduce to alternate-day plecanatide while the severe diarrhea continues (Why this does not fit)

    The label calls for suspension and rehydration during severe diarrhea rather than continued intermittent exposure.

  2. B. Treat the dizziness alone while maintaining the same dose (Why this does not fit)

    Orthostatic symptoms suggest volume loss, so the responsible medication and hydration both need attention.

  3. C. Suspend plecanatide and rehydrate (Best answer)

    Severe diarrhea is a labeled reason to suspend treatment.

  4. D. Continue unchanged for another week to allow adaptation (Why this does not fit)

    Profuse diarrhea with orthostatic symptoms is a stopping signal, not a routine tolerability trial.

Takeaway: Mechanism-related adverse effects can require stopping the drug.

Case sources: [6]

Case 24

A 46-year-old man with hard stools for two months began an anticholinergic medicine shortly before symptoms started. He has no alarm findings. What should be included before declaring refractory CIC?

Show answer and explanations for case 24
  1. A. Diagnose IBS-C solely from a medication-associated stool change (Why this does not fit)

    IBS-C requires an appropriate pain and bowel phenotype.

  2. B. Review the constipating medication and reversible contributors (Best answer)

    Secondary causes and adequate treatment trials should be addressed first.

  3. C. Order colonic transit testing without reviewing the new medication (Why this does not fit)

    Transit assessment may later be useful, but the temporally related secondary contributor should be addressed first.

  4. D. Assume a normal-frequency stool excludes constipation (Why this does not fit)

    Hard difficult stools can occur without profound infrequency.

Takeaway: A treatment-related cause may be more actionable than another laxative.

Case sources: [2]

Case 25

A 38-year-old woman with IBS-C asks whether tenapanor is safe for her 4-year-old son's constipation because the drug stays mainly in the gut. Which response is correct?

Show answer and explanations for case 25
  1. A. IBSRELA is contraindicated below age 6 because of serious dehydration risk (Best answer)

    Minimal systemic exposure does not prevent harmful intestinal fluid loss.

  2. B. Use a reduced adult IBSRELA dose because there is little systemic absorption (Why this does not fit)

    Local intestinal water loss can cause serious dehydration and the age-specific contraindication still applies.

  3. C. Apply the linaclotide pediatric age boundary to IBSRELA (Why this does not fit)

    These are different drugs with different labeled pediatric indications and restrictions.

  4. D. Treat age 6 as the only pediatric restriction to remember (Why this does not fit)

    In addition to the contraindication below 6, the label advises avoidance from 6 to under 12 and states pediatric effectiveness below 18 is unestablished.

Takeaway: Local drug action can still create systemic harm.

Case sources: [7]

Search Bone Wizardry

Quick links