⌘ KStart free
0%
Skip to lesson

neuro

Extraocular Muscles, Gaze and Visual Fields

Localize binocular diplopia, pupil and lid findings, pontine gaze circuits, and visual field loss with patient-sided H-test anatomy and clinical cases.

A single symptom can name several pathways. Predict what else each proposed lesion must change, then compare it with the patient’s actual examination.

First decide what failed

Cover either eye when someone reports two images. Binocular diplopia disappears with either eye covered because the two eyes are misaligned. If doubling persists while viewing through just the affected eye, consider ocular optics or retina before a gaze pathway. A missing portion of the visual world is not double vision. Test each eye and formal visual fields rather than labeling every complaint an eye-muscle palsy. Ask whether separation is horizontal, vertical, or tilted, whether distance or near is worse, and which gaze increases it. Pain, new headache, acuity loss, pupillary change, proptosis, and other neurologic findings change the urgency and localization. [1]

Predict. If only the patient left eye fails to abduct on left gaze while the right eye adducts, has the shared leftward command failed? No. The right adduction proves it reached the partner eye. This is a peripheral left abduction problem until other signs refine it. If both eyes fail leftward, inspect the pontine gaze circuit instead. This comparison works better than memorizing a photograph of a deviated eye. [1]

Patient-facing gaze and diagnostic muscle pairsTwo patient eyes with horizontal and diagonal gaze arrows. Down-right uses right inferior rectus and left superior oblique.Patient rightPatient leftDown and toward patient rightLeft SORight IR
In down-right gaze the patient right eye is abducted and tested through inferior rectus, while the patient left eye is adducted and tested through superior oblique. Compare the labeled pathways and resulting deficit. [1]

The patient is facing you in the diagram. Patient right is at the left of an examiner looking at the face, but every direction named here belongs to the patient. To look patient right, the right eye abducts and the left adducts. Down-right tests the right inferior rectus in abduction and left superior oblique in adduction. The diagram describes a diagnostic position, not an assertion that one muscle alone causes the entire version. [1]

How muscle vectors become examination findings

From straight-ahead primary position, medial rectus adducts and lateral rectus abducts. Superior rectus chiefly elevates, inferior rectus chiefly depresses, superior oblique chiefly intorts, and inferior oblique chiefly extorts. Recti also contribute torsion and adduction; obliques also contribute vertical movement and abduction. Because their pulls are oblique to the globe, horizontal positioning isolates different vertical actions in the H test. In abduction, superior and inferior recti are useful elevators and depressors. In adduction, inferior oblique elevates and superior oblique depresses. Do not call downward depression the primary action of superior oblique in straight-ahead gaze. [1]

LR6, SO4, all others III. Lateral rectus receives abducens nerve VI; superior oblique receives trochlear IV. Oculomotor III supplies medial, superior and inferior recti, inferior oblique, the main upper-lid elevator, and parasympathetic pupil constriction. This is innervation, not a license to diagnose from one cardinal position alone. Repeat versions, compare each eye, inspect pupils and lids, and ask whether passive movement seems restricted. A fibrotic inferior rectus in thyroid eye disease can resist attempted elevation even though its nerve is not weak. Fatigable changing ptosis or ophthalmoparesis with spared pupils suggests a neuromuscular-junction mimic such as myasthenia. [1]

Trochlear injury weakens intorsion and depression in adduction. The affected eye may sit high and produce vertical or torsional diplopia during reading or descending stairs. A patient with a left superior oblique palsy often tilts the head right to reduce misalignment; observe rather than assume every head tilt has that cause. Its dorsal exit and course near the tentorium make IV vulnerable in trauma, but congenital and other causes exist. [1]

Try a transfer. On patient left-down gaze, which eye is adducted? The right. Failure of that right eye to descend there suggests right superior oblique dysfunction; the left inferior rectus is the abducted partner. This is a localizing prediction, not yet an etiology. [1]

Nerve, pupil, lid and pressure

An isolated peripheral VI palsy weakens ipsilateral lateral rectus. The affected eye may rest inward, abduction fails, and horizontal binocular diplopia often worsens at distance and toward the affected side. A VI nucleus lesion instead interrupts the ipsilateral lateral rectus command and interneurons to contralateral medial rectus. Raised intracranial pressure can stretch VI along its long clival course, producing an abduction deficit that does not identify the pressure source in the pons. Papilledema and headache change the interpretation. [1][3]

A substantial III palsy can combine poor adduction, elevation and depression with prominent ptosis and a down-and-out resting position. Superficial parasympathetic fibers make a larger poorly reactive pupil especially concerning for compression, classically a posterior communicating artery aneurysm. A complete isolated pupil-sparing palsy in a patient with vascular risk factors may be microvascular, yet a normal pupil does not exclude aneurysm, especially in partial or evolving palsy. Acute suspected III palsy warrants urgent expert evaluation and vascular imaging as appropriate; do not simply send it home because the pupil reacts. [2]

Horner syndrome differs. Sympathetic interruption weakens the small superior tarsal lid elevator, making typically mild ptosis with ipsilateral miosis, not a III-pattern external ophthalmoplegia. Anisocoria larger in darkness identifies the smaller pupil as the abnormal one; anisocoria larger in bright light makes the larger poorly constricting pupil more concerning. Light and dark comparisons are aids, not substitutes for acute assessment. Painful Horner with neck symptoms can indicate carotid pathology. [1]

Wernicke encephalopathy is a different urgent metabolic context. In a person at risk for thiamine deficiency, ophthalmoplegia or nystagmus with ataxia and encephalopathy is characteristic, but the complete triad is often absent. A lone abduction deficit is not proof of Wernicke. Compare systemic and neurologic findings before reducing every VI-looking deficit to one disease. [1][3]

Follow the command across the pons

For patient leftward horizontal gaze, the right frontal eye field drives the opposite left pontine gaze network. The left frontal eye field instead drives rightward gaze. In the pons, a left abducens nucleus activates the left lateral rectus through VI and sends interneurons across to the right medial rectus subnucleus through the right medial longitudinal fasciculus, or MLF. The PPRF supplies burst activity for fast ipsilateral saccades. Therefore a PPRF lesion can spare pursuit or vestibular movements that an abducens nuclear lesion does not. [1][3]

Horizontal gaze circuitLeft abducens nucleus drives left lateral rectus and crosses through right MLF to right medial rectus.Left VI nucleusRight MLFRight IIILook toward patient leftLeft LRRight MROne-eye failure is nerve; both-eye failure is gaze circuit.
The abducens nucleus coordinates both eyes; the peripheral VI nerve supplies only ipsilateral lateral rectus. A PPRF lesion chiefly impairs rapid ipsilateral saccades. Compare the labeled pathways and resulting deficit. [3]

A right INO means the right eye adducts slowly or incompletely on left gaze, often with nystagmus in the abducting left eye. The lesion is in the right MLF. Convergence can remain effective because near vergence reaches the medial rectus by a different route, but it is not invariably intact. Myasthenia may imitate INO; consistency and associated signs matter. A left pontine VI nucleus or PPRF lesion plus left MLF lesion gives a leftward gaze palsy and failure of left adduction on right gaze. Only right abduction remains horizontally, the one-and-a-half pattern. Facial fascicles loop around VI nucleus, so ipsilateral lower-motor-neuron facial weakness can accompany it. [1][3]

A destructive left frontal eye field lesion, such as a stroke, often leaves the eyes turned left, toward the injured cortex, because rightward drive is lost. Irritation of the left field during a seizure can drive both eyes right, away from that focus. This is a conjugate cortical preference, not a fixed weakness of one lateral rectus. Test the whole neurologic examination rather than reversing lesion side from a single gaze snapshot. [1]

Afferent vision is a different map

Visual information begins in the retina. Nasal retinal fibers cross at the optic chiasm; temporal retinal fibers stay on their side. Because the image is optically reversed, a right visual-world defect in both eyes localizes to the left postchiasmal tract, radiations, or cortex. A lesion of one retina or optic nerve affects one eye; central chiasm compression preferentially removes the temporal fields in both. Formal perimetry distinguishes a real field defect from inability to aim a gaze at a target. [4]

Crossing visual pathwayNasal retinal fibers cross at chiasm; postchiasmal left pathways represent right visual field.RetinasChiasmLeft cortexRight cortexNasal fibers cross; temporal stay
One-eye loss is prechiasmal, bitemporal loss suggests chiasm, and a matching side of the world in both eyes points posterior to it. Compare the labeled pathways and resulting deficit. [4]

The optic tract carries contralateral field information toward the lateral geniculate nucleus. From there temporal lobe fibers sweep forward in Meyer loop carrying the contralateral upper visual quadrant. Parietal radiations carry the contralateral lower quadrant. Occipital lesions commonly produce a contralateral homonymous defect, sometimes with central vision spared; macular sparing is possible, not a required stamp of every occipital lesion. [4]

Field quadrants and optic radiationsTemporal Meyer loop carries contralateral upper field and parietal radiation carries contralateral lower field.Right upper fieldLeft temporal Meyer loopLeft parietal radiationLeft occipital cortex
For a left-sided lesion, right superior quadrantanopia points to temporal Meyer loop; right inferior quadrantanopia points to parietal radiations. Compare the labeled pathways and resulting deficit. [4]

Decision tool. First cover an eye. If true doubling disappears with either cover, test alignment and each eye's movements. If vision itself is absent, test fields in each eye, find monocular versus bitemporal versus homonymous, then map the quadrant. For misalignment, compare one-eye with both-eye failure; then examine pupil, lid, convergence, nystagmus, gaze speed, and other neurologic findings. An acute III pattern gets urgent evaluation whatever the pupil; a VI pattern plus pressure signs should not be labeled a focal pontine lesion by default. [1][2][3][4]

Practice with clinical cases

Choose one best answer, then compare every explanation with the observed findings.

Case 1

A cyclist develops vertical binocular diplopia after a fall. The left eye is higher than the right, particularly during right-down gaze; he tilts his head right and struggles on stairs. Which injured peripheral nerve best accounts for the pattern?

Show answer and explanations for case 1
  1. A. Left oculomotor nerve (Why this does not fit)

    III can impair several vertical muscles and the lid. Isolated left hypertropia in right-down gaze with compensatory right tilt fits IV better.

  2. B. Right oculomotor nerve (Why this does not fit)

    III can cause complex diplopia. A right III lesion would primarily weaken the right eye, not selectively elevate the left adducted eye.

  3. C. Left trochlear nerve (Best answer)

    Left superior oblique depression in adduction is weak. The left eye is adducted on right gaze and rises when asked to descend.

  4. D. Left abducens nerve (Why this does not fit)

    A left VI lesion impairs left abduction. It would produce mainly horizontal separation on left gaze, not this adducted-eye hypertropia.

  5. E. Right trochlear nerve (Why this does not fit)

    A right IV palsy could produce tilted vertical images. It would raise the right rather than left eye in the diagnostic position.

Takeaway: Use the affected eye and its position in the H test before naming IV.

Case sources: [1]

Case 2

After thyroid inflammation, a patient cannot elevate the left eye. It is proptotic, and passive upward rotation meets resistance on forced duction; pupil and lid are normal. Which mechanism best explains the limited elevation?

Show answer and explanations for case 2
  1. A. Left superior rectus denervation (Why this does not fit)

    Superior rectus weakness limits active upward movement. It would not itself resist passive elevation.

  2. B. Left inferior oblique denervation (Why this does not fit)

    Inferior oblique elevates in adduction. Its weakness would not account for resistance to passive upward rotation.

  3. C. Left inferior rectus restriction (Best answer)

    A tight inferior rectus opposes upward rotation. Proptosis and resistance on passive testing support orbital restriction.

  4. D. Left MLF injury (Why this does not fit)

    MLF injury impairs adduction on conjugate gaze. It does not tether the globe during passive elevation.

  5. E. Left trochlear neuropathy (Why this does not fit)

    IV weakens superior oblique depression in adduction. This patient has an upward rather than downward limitation with mechanical resistance.

Takeaway: Passive resistance separates restriction from a weak motor command.

Case sources: [1]

Case 3

A patient sees double only with both eyes open. On patient right gaze, the right eye abducts and the left eye fails to adduct, with right abducting nystagmus. Near convergence still brings the left eye inward. Which site is most likely?

Show answer and explanations for case 3
  1. A. Left medial longitudinal fasciculus (Best answer)

    The left adducting signal is interrupted during rightward conjugate gaze. Preserved near adduction and right abducting nystagmus support left INO.

  2. B. Right medial longitudinal fasciculus (Why this does not fit)

    A right MLF lesion strands right adduction on left gaze. This patient fails left adduction on right gaze.

  3. C. Right abducens nucleus (Why this does not fit)

    A right VI nuclear lesion interrupts both eyes on right gaze. Right abduction remains and left adduction alone fails.

  4. D. Left oculomotor nerve (Why this does not fit)

    A left III lesion can impair medial rectus. Effective near adduction and no ptosis or other III weakness favor the internuclear route.

  5. E. Right abducens nerve (Why this does not fit)

    Right VI weakness would prevent right abduction. The right eye abducts and shows nystagmus.

Takeaway: Name INO for the eye failing adduction, not the abducting eye.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 4

During attempted patient left gaze, the left eye stays near midline while the right eye adducts normally. On right gaze both eyes move fully, and eyelids and pupils are normal. Which localization best predicts this asymmetry?

Show answer and explanations for case 4
  1. A. Left abducens nerve (Best answer)

    The left lateral rectus output fails while the right medial rectus receives the shared command. This is a one-eye abduction pattern.

  2. B. Left frontal eye field (Why this does not fit)

    A left cortical destructive lesion impairs contralateral conjugate gaze. It would not isolate the left lateral rectus.

  3. C. Right MLF (Why this does not fit)

    Right MLF injury impairs right adduction on left gaze. That movement is intact.

  4. D. Left abducens nucleus (Why this does not fit)

    The nucleus also sends right medial rectus interneurons. Its injury should impair right adduction on left gaze.

  5. E. Left PPRF (Why this does not fit)

    A left PPRF saccade deficit affects the conjugate rapid command. The preserved partner adduction argues against it as the isolated lesion.

Takeaway: Partner-eye adduction distinguishes a VI nerve palsy from the VI nucleus.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 5

A patient with new headache and bilateral papilledema has horizontal diplopia, worse looking right. The right eye does not abduct, but the left adducts normally. MRI identifies a large left hemispheric mass without a pontine lesion. How should the right eye finding be interpreted?

Show answer and explanations for case 5
  1. A. Right MLF lesion (Why this does not fit)

    Right INO impairs right adduction on left gaze. Here right abduction fails and the partner adducts.

  2. B. Left frontal eye field destruction (Why this does not fit)

    Left FEF loss can bias conjugate gaze left. It does not by itself isolate right abduction failure.

  3. C. Right optic nerve compression (Why this does not fit)

    Optic neuropathy may cause monocular visual loss. It does not directly explain binocular diplopia from right abduction failure.

  4. D. Right VI dysfunction as a pressure-related false localizing sign (Best answer)

    Raised pressure may stretch the long right VI course. Its side need not identify the mass site.

  5. E. Right VI nucleus infarction (Why this does not fit)

    A right nuclear injury could impair horizontal gaze. The left eye adducts normally on right gaze, and pressure signs point elsewhere.

Takeaway: VI can signal raised pressure without localizing the primary lesion.

Case sources: [1]

Case 6

A patient has sudden left ptosis, poor left adduction and elevation, and a large sluggish left pupil with severe headache. Noncontrast CT shows no hemorrhage. Which immediate diagnostic direction best addresses the dangerous alternative?

Show answer and explanations for case 6
  1. A. Visual-field testing alone (Why this does not fit)

    Fields can detect afferent pathway loss. They do not address acute pupillary and motor III dysfunction with headache.

  2. B. Ice-pack test alone (Why this does not fit)

    Variable myasthenic ptosis may improve with cooling. It does not explain this poorly reactive enlarged pupil or remove aneurysm concern.

  3. C. Outpatient glucose measurement alone (Why this does not fit)

    Microvascular III palsy is possible in some patients. The severe headache and large sluggish pupil require urgent exclusion of compression.

  4. D. Observe for several weeks without imaging (Why this does not fit)

    Some ischemic III palsies recover. Waiting here could miss a symptomatic aneurysm.

  5. E. Urgent intracranial vascular imaging and expert evaluation (Best answer)

    The acute left III pattern with pupillary involvement raises aneurysm concern. A negative noncontrast CT does not examine the arterial cause adequately.

Takeaway: An acute III pattern requires urgent assessment; noncontrast CT alone is not vascular exclusion.

Case sources: [2]

Case 7

A 64-year-old with diabetes develops acute complete right III motor weakness and ptosis, but both pupils react equally. No other deficit is found. A trainee proposes discharge because an aneurysm is impossible. Which response is best?

Show answer and explanations for case 7
  1. A. Diagnose right trochlear palsy (Why this does not fit)

    Trochlear injury causes vertical torsional diplopia. It does not produce the multiple right III motor deficits and marked ptosis.

  2. B. Diagnose right Horner syndrome (Why this does not fit)

    Horner causes a smaller pupil and usually mild ptosis. It cannot account for complete right III motor weakness.

  3. C. Arrange urgent third-nerve evaluation, including vascular assessment (Best answer)

    Microvascular injury is plausible with a complete pupil-sparing pattern. Pupil sparing does not absolutely exclude aneurysm, especially early.

  4. D. Accept microvascular ischemia as established without further assessment (Why this does not fit)

    Diabetes and a reactive pupil favor ischemia. They cannot make aneurysm impossible in an acute III palsy.

  5. E. Diagnose right INO (Why this does not fit)

    Right MLF injury can slow right adduction. It does not explain full III-distribution weakness and ptosis.

Takeaway: Pupil sparing changes probability, not the need to assess an acute third palsy.

Case sources: [2]

Case 8

A patient has mild right upper-lid droop and a smaller right pupil. Anisocoria increases in a dark room; horizontal and vertical versions remain full. Which pathway is most consistent?

Show answer and explanations for case 8
  1. A. Right oculomotor nerve (Why this does not fit)

    III palsy can cause ptosis. Its parasympathetic pupil loss gives a larger pupil and typically other eye movement deficits.

  2. B. Right oculosympathetic pathway (Best answer)

    The smaller right pupil fails to dilate in darkness, and superior tarsal weakness gives mild ptosis. Full versions spare the III motor pattern.

  3. C. Right optic nerve (Why this does not fit)

    A right optic neuropathy affects afferent vision or pupillary input. It does not produce this miosis plus mild ptosis combination.

  4. D. Left oculosympathetic pathway (Why this does not fit)

    A left Horner pupil would be smaller on the left. The right is smaller and anisocoria enlarges in darkness.

  5. E. Right trochlear nerve (Why this does not fit)

    IV injury gives torsional or vertical misalignment. It does not constrict the right pupil.

Takeaway: In dark anisocoria, inspect the small pupil; Horner differs from III.

Case sources: [1]

Case 9

A malnourished patient after prolonged vomiting is inattentive, walks unsteadily, and has gaze-evoked nystagmus with bilateral limited abduction. Which interpretation integrates the ocular findings without making an isolated VI deficit diagnostic?

Show answer and explanations for case 9
  1. A. Isolated right MLF infarct (Why this does not fit)

    A right MLF lesion impairs right adduction on left gaze. It does not explain bilateral abduction limits and systemic encephalopathy.

  2. B. Suspected thiamine-deficiency Wernicke encephalopathy (Best answer)

    Ocular motor dysfunction with ataxia and encephalopathy in this nutritional setting supports Wernicke. The full triad need not always appear.

  3. C. Left trochlear nerve trauma (Why this does not fit)

    A left IV injury may yield vertical diplopia. It cannot integrate bilateral nystagmus, ataxia, and attention change.

  4. D. Optic chiasm compression (Why this does not fit)

    Chiasmal injury affects temporal visual fields. It does not explain the ocular motor and gait findings.

  5. E. Bilateral isolated microvascular VI palsies (Why this does not fit)

    Bilateral VI palsies could explain abduction difficulty. They do not explain the acute encephalopathy and ataxia in this setting.

Takeaway: Wernicke is a context and syndrome, not a synonym for VI palsy.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 10

A focal left dorsal pontine infarct leaves neither eye able to look left on rapid target shifts, but vestibular head-turn testing drives both eyes left. Rightward gaze remains intact. Which structure best fits the selective deficit?

Show answer and explanations for case 10
  1. A. Left VI nucleus (Why this does not fit)

    A left VI nuclear lesion blocks leftward conjugate gaze across voluntary and reflex pathways. Vestibular leftward movement is preserved.

  2. B. Right frontal eye field (Why this does not fit)

    A right FEF lesion can disrupt leftward voluntary drive. A focal left dorsal pontine lesion with selectively lost saccades points to local PPRF.

  3. C. Left VI nerve (Why this does not fit)

    A peripheral nerve lesion impairs only left abduction. Both eyes have impaired leftward rapid shifts.

  4. D. Right MLF (Why this does not fit)

    A right MLF lesion impairs right adduction during left gaze. It would not selectively eliminate both eyes’ left saccades while sparing reflex gaze.

  5. E. Left PPRF (Best answer)

    Left pontine burst neurons generate fast leftward saccades. Preserved vestibular drive argues for a premotor rather than VI nuclear interruption.

Takeaway: Reflex preservation can distinguish PPRF from VI nucleus.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 11

After a left pontine hemorrhage, neither eye looks left. On attempted right gaze the right eye abducts but the left does not adduct; left lower-motor-neuron facial weakness is present. Which combined localization is most coherent?

Show answer and explanations for case 11
  1. A. Left optic tract and left III (Why this does not fit)

    A visual tract produces right homonymous loss and III affects more muscles and lid. This selective horizontal pontine circuit pattern is different.

  2. B. Left peripheral VI and right MLF (Why this does not fit)

    Left VI explains left abduction loss, but right MLF would impair right adduction on left gaze rather than left adduction on right gaze.

  3. C. Right abducens nucleus and right MLF (Why this does not fit)

    A right one-and-a-half lesion abolishes rightward conjugate gaze. This patient loses left gaze and left adduction.

  4. D. Bilateral peripheral VI nerves (Why this does not fit)

    Bilateral VI injury impairs both eyes’ abduction. Right abduction remains, while left adduction also fails.

  5. E. Left abducens nucleus and left MLF (Best answer)

    The left gaze command and left adducting link are both interrupted. Right abduction remains, and nearby VII fascicles explain facial weakness.

Takeaway: One-and-a-half side is the failed conjugate gaze and ipsilateral adduction side.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 12

A patient with an acute left frontal infarct initially looks left with both eyes and has right arm weakness. Pupils react and vestibular maneuvers can carry gaze right. Which mechanism predicts the resting preference?

Show answer and explanations for case 12
  1. A. Right PPRF destruction (Why this does not fit)

    A right PPRF lesion impairs rapid rightward gaze. The concurrent left frontal lesion and right arm weakness make left cortical destruction the coherent site.

  2. B. Left MLF infarction (Why this does not fit)

    Left INO affects left adduction on right gaze. It does not cause a conjugate leftward resting preference.

  3. C. Left peripheral VI palsy (Why this does not fit)

    Left VI weakness impairs left abduction alone. Both eyes share a leftward preference with preserved vestibular movement.

  4. D. Loss of left FEF drive to rightward gaze (Best answer)

    A destructive left frontal eye field lesion weakens contralateral gaze drive. The intact opposite drive biases both eyes toward the left lesion.

  5. E. Irritation of left FEF by seizure (Why this does not fit)

    Left FEF excitation typically drives eyes right. The observed leftward preference is the destructive rather than irritative direction.

Takeaway: Destructive FEF lesions often point eyes toward the cortical lesion.

Case sources: [1]

Case 13

A focal seizure begins in the left frontal eye field. Before loss of awareness, both eyes turn forcefully right; between seizures versions are full. Which direction would a destructive lesion of the same field more typically produce?

Show answer and explanations for case 13
  1. A. Rightward gaze preference (Why this does not fit)

    Rightward turning fits active left cortical irritation. It is opposite the usual preference after left FEF destruction.

  2. B. Only left abduction loss (Why this does not fit)

    Single-eye abduction failure implies left VI output. A frontal eye field lesion acts on conjugate gaze.

  3. C. Only right adduction loss (Why this does not fit)

    Right adduction loss implies right MLF or medial rectus pathway. It is not a whole-field destructive preference.

  4. D. Bitemporal visual-field loss (Why this does not fit)

    Bitemporal loss follows chiasmal compression. It is a sensory field result, not a gaze direction predicted by FEF loss.

  5. E. Leftward gaze preference (Best answer)

    Irritation drives contralateral rightward gaze. Destruction removes that drive, leaving an ipsilateral leftward preference.

Takeaway: Excitation and destruction at the same FEF drive opposite gaze directions.

Case sources: [1]

Case 14

After a left temporal resection, formal perimetry shows loss of the right upper quadrant in each eye. Versions and visual acuity are intact. Which injured structure explains the matching quadrant?

Show answer and explanations for case 14
  1. A. Right temporal Meyer loop (Why this does not fit)

    Right temporal loop carries left upper field. This defect is right-sided in both eyes.

  2. B. Left parietal radiations (Why this does not fit)

    Left parietal radiations carry the right lower field. The affected quadrant is upper.

  3. C. Optic chiasm (Why this does not fit)

    Chiasmal injury classically affects temporal fields of both eyes. A matched right upper quadrant is postchiasmal.

  4. D. Left temporal Meyer loop (Best answer)

    Left temporal radiations carry the right upper visual field. The homonymous quadrant and operation site agree.

  5. E. Right optic nerve (Why this does not fit)

    A right optic nerve lesion affects the right eye alone. Both eyes have a matching right quadrant deficit.

Takeaway: Homonymous upper-field loss after temporal surgery points to contralateral Meyer loop.

Case sources: [4]

Case 15

A patient has a left parietal infarct. Formal fields show missing right lower quadrants in both eyes, while pursuit and saccades are full. Which structure best explains the visual complaint?

Show answer and explanations for case 15
  1. A. Left parietal optic radiations (Best answer)

    Left parietal radiations represent the right lower field. The matched quadrants are afferent postchiasmal loss.

  2. B. Left PPRF (Why this does not fit)

    PPRF injury affects rapid leftward gaze. Full movements with formal matched field loss point to vision pathways.

  3. C. Right parietal optic radiations (Why this does not fit)

    Right radiations represent left visual space. The lost field is right in both eyes.

  4. D. Optic chiasm (Why this does not fit)

    Chiasmal central compression often gives bitemporal loss. This is a right homonymous quadrant.

  5. E. Left temporal Meyer loop (Why this does not fit)

    Meyer loop lesions yield right upper, not lower, quadrant loss.

Takeaway: Parietal radiations carry the opposite lower visual quadrant.

Case sources: [4]

Case 16

An expanding sellar mass causes a patient to bump into people on both sides. Perimetry shows loss of the temporal half of each eye’s field with preserved central acuity. Which fiber group is preferentially interrupted?

Show answer and explanations for case 16
  1. A. Right optic nerve fibers (Why this does not fit)

    Right optic nerve loss is monocular. The left temporal field is also impaired.

  2. B. Crossing nasal retinal fibers at the chiasm (Best answer)

    Temporal world projects onto nasal retina, whose fibers cross centrally. Sellar pressure produces bitemporal loss.

  3. C. Left optic tract fibers (Why this does not fit)

    Left tract loss causes right homonymous field loss. The temporal halves of each eye are different world sides.

  4. D. Uncrossed temporal retinal fibers in the chiasm (Why this does not fit)

    Temporal retinal fibers carry nasal field and stay ipsilateral. Their isolated loss would not create this bilateral temporal pattern.

  5. E. Left temporal Meyer loop fibers (Why this does not fit)

    A left Meyer loop lesion affects right upper quadrants. It does not remove both temporal hemifields.

Takeaway: Bitemporal fields identify the crossing nasal retinal fibers.

Case sources: [4]

Case 17

A patient reports a dark curtain over the left eye lasting ten minutes. During the episode the right eye saw normally when the left was covered, and neither eye had movement difficulty. Which compartment best fits the transient loss?

Show answer and explanations for case 17
  1. A. Left PPRF (Why this does not fit)

    PPRF damage impairs fast conjugate left gaze. It cannot cause a transient monocular curtain.

  2. B. Left retinal or optic nerve pathway (Best answer)

    Monocular darkness confines the sensory disturbance before the chiasm. Normal movement distinguishes it from ocular motor diplopia.

  3. C. Left occipital cortex (Why this does not fit)

    Left cortex affects right visual space in both eyes. The right eye alone saw normally during left-eye loss.

  4. D. Optic chiasm (Why this does not fit)

    Central chiasm injury affects temporal fields in both eyes. This episode was entire left-eye vision.

  5. E. Left abducens nerve (Why this does not fit)

    VI palsy causes binocular horizontal diplopia. It does not black out the left eye.

Takeaway: One-eye blackout is afferent and prechiasmal, not a gaze palsy.

Case sources: [4]

Case 18

Following a left occipital infarct, a patient misses objects on the right in either eye. Formal perimetry confirms a right homonymous hemianopia, but eye movements are full. Which pathway side is injured?

Show answer and explanations for case 18
  1. A. Right postchiasmal visual pathway (Why this does not fit)

    Right tract and cortex represent left world. The missing world side is right.

  2. B. Left abducens nucleus (Why this does not fit)

    A left VI nucleus lesion impairs conjugate left gaze. Movements are full and perimetry proves a sensory defect.

  3. C. Optic chiasm (Why this does not fit)

    The chiasm classically causes bitemporal defects. This is same-side world loss in both eyes.

  4. D. Right optic nerve (Why this does not fit)

    Right optic nerve damage affects only the right eye. Both right hemifields are absent.

  5. E. Left postchiasmal visual pathway (Best answer)

    Right world information from both eyes travels through left tract, radiations, and cortex. Full versions distinguish field loss from gaze failure.

Takeaway: Name postchiasmal side opposite the missing world side.

Case sources: [4]

Case 19

A 72-year-old has horizontal diplopia on left gaze. Left abduction and right adduction both fail even with reflexive head rotation; left facial weakness includes the forehead. Which structure is more likely than an isolated peripheral VI lesion?

Show answer and explanations for case 19
  1. A. Left PPRF alone (Why this does not fit)

    PPRF loss mainly affects rapid left saccades. Reflexive head rotation can bypass it, unlike this finding.

  2. B. Right MLF alone (Why this does not fit)

    Right MLF injury interrupts right adduction on left gaze. It would spare left abduction.

  3. C. Left peripheral VI nerve (Why this does not fit)

    Left VI palsy stops only left abduction. Right medial rectus adduction should still occur on left gaze.

  4. D. Left frontal eye field alone (Why this does not fit)

    FEF loss affects rightward voluntary gaze. The deficits are leftward and persist with reflexive stimulation.

  5. E. Left VI nucleus at the facial colliculus (Best answer)

    A nuclear lesion interrupts both leftward partners and can affect looping ipsilateral facial fibers. Reflex gaze failure strengthens this localization.

Takeaway: A VI nucleus lesion impairs both leftward eyes and may include VII.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 20

A person has fluctuating ptosis and variable binocular diplopia, worse after sustained upgaze and improved after rest. Pupils react normally and there is no consistent H-test deficit. Which competing process deserves priority over a fixed III lesion?

Show answer and explanations for case 20
  1. A. Left VI neuropathy (Why this does not fit)

    VI palsy gives consistent left abduction weakness. It does not account for fatigable ptosis and shifting deficits.

  2. B. Complete left III neuropathy (Why this does not fit)

    A complete III palsy produces a stable distribution of left muscle and lid deficits. The side and pattern vary here.

  3. C. Ocular myasthenia gravis (Best answer)

    Fatigability and variability suggest neuromuscular junction dysfunction. Normal pupils and changing patterns fit this mimic.

  4. D. Right MLF lesion (Why this does not fit)

    Right INO consistently slows right adduction on left gaze. No fixed adduction pattern is present.

  5. E. Left IV neuropathy (Why this does not fit)

    IV palsy typically gives reproducible vertical misalignment on downgaze. The variable ptosis and changing weakness point elsewhere.

Takeaway: Variable fatigable ocular weakness can mimic multiple fixed palsies.

Case sources: [1]

Case 21

A patient with new right ptosis and restricted right adduction, elevation, and depression has a 3-mm larger right pupil in bright light. Which additional finding best supports a right III parasympathetic rather than right Horner pattern?

Show answer and explanations for case 21
  1. A. Right anisocoria greater in darkness (Why this does not fit)

    Darkness emphasizes failure of the smaller sympathetic pupil to dilate. That would favor Horner rather than III.

  2. B. Smaller right pupil in daylight (Why this does not fit)

    A small pupil points toward sympathetic dysfunction. The supplied right pupil is larger in bright light.

  3. C. Right anisocoria greater in bright illumination (Best answer)

    The larger right pupil cannot constrict properly in light. III parasympathetic loss also matches the external ophthalmoplegia.

  4. D. Normal right eye movements (Why this does not fit)

    Normal versions would reduce evidence for external III weakness. The observed movements are restricted.

  5. E. Mild right ptosis with full versions (Why this does not fit)

    Mild ptosis and intact eye movements suit sympathetic loss. This patient has multiple III motor deficits.

Takeaway: Bright-light anisocoria implicates the larger, poorly constricting pupil.

Case sources: [1] [2]

Case 22

A patient with suspected right superior oblique weakness sees vertically separated images on left-down gaze. Which paired muscle action should the examiner compare in that position?

Show answer and explanations for case 22
  1. A. Right medial rectus with left lateral rectus alone (Why this does not fit)

    These horizontal partners participate in patient left gaze. They do not distinguish which vertical muscle depresses each positioned eye.

  2. B. Right superior oblique with left inferior rectus (Best answer)

    The right eye adducts on patient left gaze, using SO for depression; the left eye abducts, using IR. This pair tests the suspected deficit.

  3. C. Right lateral rectus with left medial rectus (Why this does not fit)

    Those horizontal muscles coordinate patient right gaze. They do not define the vertical depressed pair on left gaze.

  4. D. Right inferior rectus with left superior oblique (Why this does not fit)

    That pair depresses on patient right gaze. Here the patient looks left-down.

  5. E. Right superior rectus with left inferior oblique (Why this does not fit)

    Those muscles elevate in their diagnostic positions. The requested gaze is downward.

Takeaway: Always anchor H-test pairs to the patient’s side and each eye’s adduction.

Case sources: [1]

Case 23

A person with suspected left IV dysfunction has vertical diplopia after trauma. On right-down gaze the left eye is high, and tilting the head left worsens separation. Which new observation would most challenge isolated left IV palsy?

Show answer and explanations for case 23
  1. A. Difficulty looking at a lower stair (Why this does not fit)

    Downward gaze recruits superior oblique in adduction. This supports the left IV hypothesis.

  2. B. Less separation on right head tilt (Why this does not fit)

    Compensatory tilt away from a left IV palsy can reduce separation. It supports rather than refutes the pattern.

  3. C. Marked left ptosis with impaired left adduction and a larger sluggish pupil (Best answer)

    Those additional motor and pupil deficits span left III, not isolated superior oblique. Acute III signs change urgency.

  4. D. History of head impact (Why this does not fit)

    Trauma can injure the vulnerable trochlear nerve. It does not challenge left IV on its own.

  5. E. Left hypertropia more prominent on right gaze (Why this does not fit)

    Right gaze adducts the left eye, revealing weak depression. This fits left IV.

Takeaway: A third-nerve pupil and lid pattern cannot be hidden under isolated IV.

Case sources: [1] [2]

Case 24

A patient has a right gaze-evoked deficit with slow left-eye adducting saccades and right abducting nystagmus. Convergence is also reduced. A colleague rejects INO solely for that reason. Which interpretation best fits?

Show answer and explanations for case 24
  1. A. Left optic tract lesion is proven (Why this does not fit)

    Optic tract pathology produces contralateral field loss. It does not account for specific saccadic adduction lag.

  2. B. Right MLF lesion is proven (Why this does not fit)

    A right MLF lesion would slow right adduction during left gaze. The left eye is the slow adductor.

  3. C. Right VI nucleus lesion is proven (Why this does not fit)

    Right nuclear injury impairs conjugate right gaze. Right abduction occurs with nystagmus, favoring a left MLF lesion.

  4. D. Left MLF lesion remains possible (Best answer)

    Left adduction lag with right abducting nystagmus localizes left internuclear coordination. Convergence is often preserved but not invariably.

  5. E. Left VI nerve palsy is proven (Why this does not fit)

    A left VI palsy impairs left abduction. Here left adduction on right gaze is slow.

Takeaway: Convergence may be preserved in INO; loss of it does not erase the rest of the pattern.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 25

A patient with binocular diplopia has left medial rectus weakness on rightward gaze, while near convergence brings the left eye inward. Which perturbation would most directly turn this isolated internuclear pattern into a left one-and-a-half syndrome?

Show answer and explanations for case 25
  1. A. Add a left optic nerve lesion (Why this does not fit)

    Left monocular vision could decrease. The horizontal motor pattern would not become one-and-a-half.

  2. B. Add a left IV nerve lesion (Why this does not fit)

    Vertical torsional diplopia could join the examination. It does not produce a horizontal conjugate gaze palsy.

  3. C. Add a left VI nuclear or PPRF lesion causing leftward gaze palsy (Best answer)

    A left MLF deficit already impairs left adduction on right gaze. Adding ipsilateral horizontal gaze-center failure removes leftward conjugate gaze.

  4. D. Add a right peripheral VI nerve lesion (Why this does not fit)

    Right abduction would then fail on right gaze. This does not create a leftward conjugate gaze palsy.

  5. E. Add a right temporal Meyer loop lesion (Why this does not fit)

    Left upper visual quadrant could disappear. It does not remove leftward conjugate movement.

Takeaway: One-and-a-half combines a unilateral gaze-center lesion with ipsilateral MLF injury.

Case sources: [3]

Search Bone Wizardry

Quick links