⌘ KStart free
0%
Skip to lesson

OMM

Lumbar and Pelvic Counterstrain: Landmarks Before Positions

Locate lumbar and pelvic tender points, compare their positions of ease, and practice counterstrain decisions grounded in anatomy and patient response.

Two tender points near the pelvis can require opposite hip positions. A point just below the PSIS is not treated like one just above it, and a piriformis point is not identified by the word “buttock” alone. Start with the exact landmark, then use the prescribed position as an initial estimate of comfort.

A monitored position of ease, not a stretch

Counterstrain is an indirect, passive approach to a localized tender point associated with somatic dysfunction. The patient remains relaxed while the clinician supports a position that substantially reduces tenderness. The tender point is a monitor for the response, not a structure to crush or massage continuously. A tender point also differs from a myofascial trigger point, which is classically associated with a taut muscular band and a referred pain pattern. A tender point by itself does not establish a specific muscle tear, nerve entrapment, or visceral diagnosis. [1] [3]

First identify the point, establish a reproducible baseline tenderness, and explain how the patient will report changes. Traditional instruction seeks approximately 70% reduction before beginning the standard 90-second hold. If baseline tenderness is called ten, the positioning goal is roughly three or less with comparable monitoring pressure. This is a teaching convention, not a validated threshold proving a diagnosis or guaranteeing an outcome. After the hold, the clinician slowly returns the relaxed patient to neutral and reassesses. [1]

  1. Identify a discrete point and record baseline tenderness.
  2. Support the patient in an anatomically appropriate position of ease.
  3. Fine-tune while checking that tenderness substantially decreases.
  4. Maintain the comfortable position for the standard 90 seconds.
  5. Return slowly and passively to neutral, then retest the point and useful function.
The sequence describes supervised clinical technique. The listed angles below are approximate starting positions, not force targets.

If tenderness increases, stop and reassess support, positioning, pressure, and the clinical interpretation. Do not simply press harder until the patient changes the rating. Proposed explanations include changes in neuromuscular reflex activity and pain processing, but an exact muscle-spindle “reset” at 90 seconds is not established physiology. The measured result is the patient's response after the intervention. Prioritizing a dominant or central point can be useful, but treatment order should follow the examination and tolerance rather than a rule that the most painful point always comes first.

Read the anterior pelvis from lateral to medial

Locate the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), pubic symphysis, and pubic tubercle before assigning names. The ASIS and AIIS are different landmarks. The pubic tubercle is lateral to the symphysis; it is not interchangeable with every point on the pubic ramus. Abdominal or inguinal palpation requires explanation, appropriate draping, consent, and attention to underlying structures. Do not pursue a presumed point through an acutely painful abdomen. [1]

One side, viewed from the front: ASIS toward the midline
Relative positionCommon teaching labelInitial positioning theme
ASIS → about one-third of the distance toward midlineIliacus, more lateralMarked bilateral hip flexion with external rotation
ASIS → about two-thirds of the distance toward midlinePsoas major, more medialBilateral hip flexion and external rotation; ipsilateral lumbar sidebending can refine ease
Superior to the iliopectineal eminence, between AIIS and pubic tubercleLow ilium, psoas minor regionSubstantial ipsilateral hip flexion, commonly around 100 degrees
Lateral aspect of pubic tubercle near inguinal ligament attachmentInguinal, pectineus regionBilateral hip and knee flexion with ipsilateral adduction and internal rotation
Fractions start at the ASIS. Two-thirds is closer to the midline than one-third. These surface relationships do not make deep palpation uniquely diagnostic of an individual muscle.

Psoas and iliacus share a hip-flexion role but occupy different anatomical regions. Their similar positions of ease do not erase the distinction between the more medial psoas monitor and more lateral iliacus monitor. Quadriceps or abdominal guarding can interfere with supported hip positioning. Ask the patient to let the clinician carry the weight of the legs; active lifting changes the technique and may reproduce symptoms. [1] [3]

A groin provocation test is a different procedure. FADIR means flexion, adduction, and internal rotation; FABER means flexion, abduction, and external rotation. A painful FADIR response can raise concern about hip pathology but does not independently diagnose it. A comfortable counterstrain position is selected to reduce the monitored tenderness. Neither a FABER response nor relief during hip flexion proves an iliacus diagnosis. [5]

Keep anterior lumbar levels and trunk directions separate

Anterior lumbar tender-point numbers do not mean that the point lies directly over that numbered vertebra. In the ATSU convention used here, AL1 is medial to the ASIS, AL2 medial to the AIIS, AL3 lateral to the AIIS, AL4 inferior to the AIIS, and AL5 on the anterior pubic ramus about one centimeter lateral to the symphysis. A point below the AIIS is AL4 in this map, even though an older quiz may have incorrectly placed it on the pubis. [1]

Anterior lumbar positioning refers to lumbar flexion, sidebending, and rotation
PointFlexion or extensionSidebending relative to pointRotation relative to point
AL1FlexionTowardAway
AL2, AL3, AL4FlexionAwayToward
AL5FlexionAwayAway

For a right AL2 point, “away” sidebending means left lumbar sidebending, while “toward” rotation means right lumbar rotation. Those words describe the trunk, not the direction a bent knee or foot happens to point. Hip positioning is a way to introduce the desired lumbar configuration. Monitor the original point throughout fine-tuning rather than substituting a memorized foot position for the tissue response.

Posterior lumbar points require a second distinction: midline versus lateral. Midline points on the spinous processes generally begin with extension alone. Lateral points at the inferolateral spinous-process or transverse-process region commonly use extension, sidebending away, and rotation toward the point in the ATSU teaching map. It is inaccurate to assign extension with both sidebending and rotation away to all posterior lumbar points. The precise point and atlas convention must be stated. [2]

Use the PSIS, sacral angle, and trochanter as separate references

The posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), inferior lateral angle of the sacrum (ILA), and greater trochanter form three distinct reference regions. Identify them before comparing upper and lower PL5, piriformis, and sacroiliac points. The superior-medial and inferior aspects of the PSIS are especially easy to conflate. A small change in the monitor location can change the initial hip position substantially. [2]

Posterior map and its important exceptions
Point and regionInitial position of easeDiscriminating relationship
Upper PL5, superomedial PSISProne hip extension with slight adductionIntroduces lumbar extension, sidebending away, and rotation toward
Lower PL5, inferior PSISProne supported hip flexion near 90 degrees, adduction, internal rotationA posterior point that uses flexion
Piriformis, between sacral ILA region and greater trochanterSupported hip flexion, commonly near 120 degrees, abduction, external rotationUsually more lateral than a sacral-margin monitor
High ilium sacroiliac, HISI, lateral to PSISHip extension with slight abductionGluteus maximus attachment region
Middle pole sacroiliac, MPSI or FOSI, lateral to ILAHip abduction with a small flexion or extension adjustmentNot the midpoint toward the greater trochanter
High ilium flare out, HIFO, lateral coccygeal regionHip extension and adduction; external rotation may refine easeDo not infer hip abduction from the words “flare out”

The sciatic nerve usually passes inferior to piriformis as it exits the pelvis, with anatomical variants. [6] Buttock pain with posterior thigh symptoms warrants assessment beyond the tender point. A negative straight-leg raise does not eliminate all lumbar or neurologic causes, and improved tenderness does not prove that sciatic entrapment was corrected. New weakness, sensory loss, or bowel or bladder symptoms require a different diagnostic priority.

Lateral PL3 and PL4 monitor gluteus medius regions: PL3 is commonly described about halfway from the PSIS toward the posterior tensor fasciae latae region near the iliac crest; PL4 is nearer the posterior tensor fasciae latae region. Both can begin with hip extension, abduction, and external rotation. These labels should not be confused with a midline L3 or L4 spinous-process point. [2]

Resolve nearby points without inventing a recipe

Quadratus lumborum spans the iliac crest, lumbar transverse processes, and twelfth rib region. Common monitors are near these attachments. A taught starting position uses hip extension, abduction, and external rotation, with the lumbar response monitored rather than the hip forced. The twelfth-rib or iliac-crest landmark distinguishes this region from the PSIS-based upper PL5 point. [3]

ATSU also distinguishes lateral trochanteric and posterolateral trochanteric points. A lateral monitor roughly twelve centimeters below the greater trochanter over the iliotibial-band region can use abduction with slight flexion. A posterolateral monitor at the superolateral posterior greater trochanter uses extension, slight abduction, and marked external rotation as tolerated. A location described simultaneously as “below the greater trochanter” and “medial to the ischial tuberosity” cannot be treated as an unambiguous single coordinate. [1]

Older low-ilium flare and posteromedial-trochanteric labels vary across teaching materials. The conflicting coordinates and opposite directions in the original material are not sufficient to define a safe additional point. For an adductor-region monitor, use an explicitly identified pubic attachment and an established atlas description, such as supported adduction with small rotational adjustments. Do not infer a mirrored inflare or outflare technique from the name. A tenderness response can help refine an identified position; it cannot repair an uncertain anatomical label.

Counterstrain is gentle in intent but requires positioning that may be inappropriate after trauma, with instability, or with surgical hip precautions. Follow the actual postoperative restrictions. An inability to relax or to communicate a reliable tenderness change may require adaptation, an interpreter, or another approach; a language difference alone is not a contraindication. End with reassessment of pain and a relevant task such as sitting, standing, or walking. If the response is absent or worse, revisit the diagnosis and technique instead of presenting the 90-second hold as guaranteed treatment.

Choose from the landmark and the response

These cases use the ATSU point convention unless another source is named. Trunk rotation and hip rotation are stated separately.

Case 1

A relaxed patient rates a lumbar tender point as ten before positioning and two after supported positioning with comparable pressure. What is the appropriate next step in standard counterstrain?

Show answer and explanations for case 1
  1. A. Ask for a maximal contraction against resistance. (Why this does not fit)

    That changes an indirect passive approach into an active effort and may reproduce pain.

  2. B. Increase pressure until the point becomes painful again. (Why this does not fit)

    The point monitors comfort; provoking greater pain is not the treatment objective.

  3. C. Rapidly return to neutral as soon as tenderness decreases. (Why this does not fit)

    The standard sequence includes the hold and a slow passive return.

  4. D. Maintain the comfortable position for approximately 90 seconds. (Best answer)

    The positioning response meets the traditional reduction goal before the hold begins.

Takeaway: Find substantial ease before beginning the standard hold.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 2

Forty seconds into a piriformis counterstrain hold, the patient's foot loses support and tenderness rises. What should the clinician do?

Show answer and explanations for case 2
  1. A. Tell the patient to hold the unsupported leg up. (Why this does not fit)

    Active support changes the passive setup and can recruit painful muscles.

  2. B. Press the point more deeply to compensate. (Why this does not fit)

    More pressure does not correct lost support or increased tenderness.

  3. C. Restore support and reassess ease before continuing. (Best answer)

    The patient is no longer in the monitored position of ease.

  4. D. Ignore the change because the first rating was acceptable. (Why this does not fit)

    The response must remain comfortable during the hold.

Takeaway: Comfort must be monitored throughout positioning.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 3

After a standard hold, a student tells the patient to straighten both legs quickly. Which correction is needed?

Show answer and explanations for case 3
  1. A. The position should be held indefinitely if tenderness improved. (Why this does not fit)

    Improvement does not require an indefinite hold; return and assess the result.

  2. B. The clinician should support a slow passive return to neutral. (Best answer)

    A sudden active return contradicts the standard counterstrain sequence.

  3. C. The patient should contract maximally before returning. (Why this does not fit)

    A maximal contraction is not required to complete counterstrain.

  4. D. The point must never be retested. (Why this does not fit)

    Reassessment is part of the method.

Takeaway: The return and reassessment are part of treatment.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 4

A patient has a focal anterior monitor about two-thirds of the distance from the right ASIS toward midline. Which comparison is anatomically consistent with the teaching map?

Show answer and explanations for case 4
  1. A. The psoas monitor is medial to the one-third iliacus point. (Best answer)

    Starting at the ASIS, traveling farther toward midline places the two-thirds point more medially.

  2. B. The psoas monitor is lateral to the iliacus point one-third from ASIS. (Why this does not fit)

    That reverses the fractions when both are measured from the ASIS.

  3. C. The psoas monitor lies directly on the posterior PSIS. (Why this does not fit)

    The described coordinates are anterior and medial to the ASIS.

  4. D. The psoas monitor lies at the tip of the twelfth rib. (Why this does not fit)

    That is a posterior upper lumbar reference, not this anterior coordinate.

Takeaway: Always identify the starting landmark when using a fraction.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 5

Following an appropriate examination, a psoas-region tender point becomes more comfortable with bilateral hip flexion. Which refinement is consistent with the POFPS teaching position?

Show answer and explanations for case 5
  1. A. Force lumbar extension with both hips straight. (Why this does not fit)

    That reverses the initial flexion-based ease described in the stem.

  2. B. Apply hip adduction and internal rotation solely because every groin point uses them. (Why this does not fit)

    Those directions fit some inguinal points but are not a universal groin prescription.

  3. C. Ask the patient to maintain a straight-leg raise throughout the hold. (Why this does not fit)

    An active leg raise undermines passive support and recruits hip flexors.

  4. D. Support external rotation and assess slight lumbar sidebending toward the point. (Best answer)

    This follows the described psoas position while allowing the monitored response to guide refinement.

Takeaway: Similar hip-flexor symptoms still require a specific monitor and supported position.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 6

A monitor lies one-third of the distance from the ASIS toward midline in the iliac fossa. What is the usual iliacus starting position?

Show answer and explanations for case 6
  1. A. Isolated knee flexion with both hips extended. (Why this does not fit)

    Knee flexion alone does not supply the described iliacus position of ease.

  2. B. Forced hip extension to stretch the hip flexor. (Why this does not fit)

    Counterstrain follows ease, not a painful stretch.

  3. C. Marked bilateral hip flexion with external rotation. (Best answer)

    This matches the iliacus monitor and reduces tension through supported positioning.

  4. D. Prone hip extension with adduction. (Why this does not fit)

    That resembles an upper PL5 or HIFO approach rather than the anterior iliacus map.

Takeaway: The iliacus monitor is relatively lateral and commonly uses bilateral flexion.

Case sources: [1] [3]

Case 7

A point is identified just superior to the iliopectineal eminence between the AIIS and pubic tubercle. Which initial position fits the low-ilium psoas-minor-region description?

Show answer and explanations for case 7
  1. A. Force maximal hip flexion regardless of symptoms. (Why this does not fit)

    The angle is an estimate for ease, not an instruction to exceed tolerance.

  2. B. Substantial supported ipsilateral hip flexion, approximately 100 degrees as tolerated. (Best answer)

    The landmark and flexion-based position match the low-ilium description.

  3. C. Prone hip extension and marked abduction. (Why this does not fit)

    That does not match this anterior low-ilium point.

  4. D. Lumbar extension with both legs unsupported. (Why this does not fit)

    This neither follows the flexion preference nor maintains passive support.

Takeaway: Approximate angles guide a comfortable setup; they are not force targets.

Case sources: [1]

Case 8

A patient has a localized inguinal monitor near the lateral aspect of the pubic tubercle. Which setup corresponds to the pectineus-region point?

Show answer and explanations for case 8
  1. A. Bilateral hip and knee flexion with ipsilateral adduction and internal rotation. (Best answer)

    This distinguishes the inguinal point from the abducted, externally rotated piriformis setup.

  2. B. Hip extension, abduction, and external rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    That is a common posterior or lateral-region theme, not this inguinal prescription.

  3. C. Hip flexion, abduction, and external rotation in every case. (Why this does not fit)

    That would confuse this point with other flexion-based points such as piriformis.

  4. D. Knee extension with no hip positioning. (Why this does not fit)

    The inguinal description depends on hip positioning, not knee extension alone.

Takeaway: Use the pubic landmark to distinguish inguinal from other flexion-based points.

Case sources: [1]

Case 9

In the ATSU map, a right AL1 point is located medial to the ASIS. Which lumbar directions are the initial prescription?

Show answer and explanations for case 9
  1. A. Flexion, left sidebending, right rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    That is the AL2-4 pattern.

  2. B. Flexion, left sidebending, left rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    That is the AL5 pattern.

  3. C. Extension, right sidebending, right rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    This does not match the anterior AL1 flexion-based pattern.

  4. D. Flexion, right sidebending, left rotation. (Best answer)

    AL1 uses flexion, sidebending toward, and rotation away from the right point.

Takeaway: AL1 differs from both the AL2-4 group and AL5.

Case sources: [1]

Case 10

A learner locates an anterior lumbar point immediately medial to the left AIIS. Which point and position match the ATSU convention?

Show answer and explanations for case 10
  1. A. AL5; flexion, right sidebending, right rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    AL5 is on the anterior pubic ramus near the symphysis.

  2. B. Midline PL2; extension alone. (Why this does not fit)

    The monitor is anterior at the AIIS, not on a posterior spinous process.

  3. C. AL2; flexion, right sidebending, left rotation. (Best answer)

    Medial AIIS identifies AL2; sidebending is away and rotation toward.

  4. D. AL1; flexion, left sidebending, right rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    AL1 is medial to the ASIS, not the AIIS.

Takeaway: ASIS and AIIS are not interchangeable landmarks.

Case sources: [1]

Case 11

A discrete point is lateral to the right AIIS. An AL3 position is being planned. Which statement is correct?

Show answer and explanations for case 11
  1. A. Use extension because the point number is three. (Why this does not fit)

    The number does not make an anterior lumbar point posterior.

  2. B. Begin with lumbar flexion, sidebending left, and rotation right. (Best answer)

    AL3 shares the flexion, sidebending-away, rotation-toward pattern of AL2 and AL4.

  3. C. Use the AL1 pattern because all anterior points sidebend toward. (Why this does not fit)

    AL1 is the exception; the AL2-4 group sidebends away.

  4. D. Identify it as AL5 because it is lateral to a bony prominence. (Why this does not fit)

    AL5 requires the pubic-ramus coordinate near the symphysis.

Takeaway: AL2, AL3, and AL4 differ in location while sharing a positioning pattern.

Case sources: [1]

Case 12

An old note calls a point inferior to the AIIS “AL4,” but a quiz places AL4 on the pubic ramus. Which correction matches the verified ATSU map?

Show answer and explanations for case 12
  1. A. AL4 lies below the AIIS: flexion, sidebending away, rotation toward. (Best answer)

    This retains the AL4 landmark and the shared AL2-4 prescription.

  2. B. AL4 is at the symphysis and uses rotation away. (Why this does not fit)

    That confuses AL4 with the AL5 region and pattern.

  3. C. AL4 is superomedial to the PSIS and uses hip extension. (Why this does not fit)

    That describes an upper PL5 region.

  4. D. Both locations are equivalent because the AIIS and pubis are the same landmark. (Why this does not fit)

    The AIIS and pubic ramus are distinct anatomical structures.

Takeaway: Do not preserve a quiz error by changing the anatomical landmark.

Case sources: [1]

Case 13

A left AL5 point is identified on the anterior pubic ramus about one centimeter lateral to the symphysis. Which lumbar setup fits?

Show answer and explanations for case 13
  1. A. Flexion, right sidebending, left rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    Rotation toward fits AL2-4, not this AL5 prescription.

  2. B. Flexion, left sidebending, right rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    Sidebending toward fits AL1, not AL5.

  3. C. Extension alone. (Why this does not fit)

    That is a common midline posterior lumbar theme, not AL5.

  4. D. Flexion, right sidebending, right rotation. (Best answer)

    Both sidebending and rotation are away from the left AL5 point.

Takeaway: AL5 uses flexion with both sidebending and rotation away.

Case sources: [1]

Case 14

A posterior lumbar monitor is on the midline of the L3 spinous process, rather than lateral to it. Which starting position best respects that distinction?

Show answer and explanations for case 14
  1. A. The lateral PL3 gluteus medius position solely because the number is three. (Why this does not fit)

    Lateral PL3 is a different pelvic monitor; the stem specifies the midline spinous process.

  2. B. A compulsory rotation away for all posterior lumbar points. (Why this does not fit)

    The original universal rule is inaccurate and ignores the midline location.

  3. C. Lumbar extension without assuming a lateral sidebending-rotation pattern. (Best answer)

    Midline posterior points generally begin with extension alone in this map.

  4. D. Flexion with both sidebending and rotation away. (Why this does not fit)

    That resembles an anterior AL5 pattern.

Takeaway: The same number does not make two differently located monitors equivalent.

Case sources: [2]

Case 15

A right posterior lumbar point lies inferolateral to a spinous process. Using the ATSU lateral posterior lumbar convention, which trunk directions are appropriate to assess first?

Show answer and explanations for case 15
  1. A. Hip internal rotation alone, with no attention to the lumbar response. (Why this does not fit)

    A hip action cannot substitute for identifying the intended trunk configuration.

  2. B. Extension, left sidebending, right rotation. (Best answer)

    The convention is extension, sidebending away, rotation toward the right point.

  3. C. Extension, left sidebending, left rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    This reverses the rotation component of the verified convention.

  4. D. Flexion, right sidebending, left rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    This resembles AL1 rather than the described posterior lateral point.

Takeaway: State whether rotation refers to the lumbar spine or the hip.

Case sources: [2]

Case 16

A monitor lies superomedial to the right PSIS and is identified as upper PL5. Which initial hip position fits?

Show answer and explanations for case 16
  1. A. Prone extension with slight adduction. (Best answer)

    This is the upper PL5 position that introduces the corresponding lumbar ease.

  2. B. Flexion near 90 degrees with adduction and internal rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    That is the lower PL5 exception below the PSIS.

  3. C. Flexion near 120 degrees with abduction and external rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    That resembles the piriformis position at a different monitor.

  4. D. Abduction alone at a point lateral to the sacral ILA. (Why this does not fit)

    That resembles MPSI rather than superomedial PSIS.

Takeaway: Above and below the PSIS identify different PL5 positions.

Case sources: [2]

Case 17

A point immediately inferior to the left PSIS is identified as lower PL5. Which option avoids the common posterior-point error?

Show answer and explanations for case 17
  1. A. Hip extension because every posterior point extends. (Why this does not fit)

    The lower PL5 prescription is an explicit exception to that generalization.

  2. B. Bilateral hip flexion and external rotation for an iliacus monitor. (Why this does not fit)

    The monitor in the stem is posterior beneath the PSIS, not in the iliac fossa.

  3. C. Lumbar flexion, sidebending toward, rotation away for AL1. (Why this does not fit)

    AL1 is an anterior ASIS-region point.

  4. D. Supported hip flexion near 90 degrees with adduction and internal rotation. (Best answer)

    Lower PL5 is a posterior point that commonly uses flexion.

Takeaway: Posterior location does not guarantee an extension prescription.

Case sources: [2]

Case 18

A patient with buttock discomfort has an appropriately assessed piriformis-region point midway between the sacral ILA region and greater trochanter. Which supported hip position is the standard ATSU starting point?

Show answer and explanations for case 18
  1. A. Flexion, adduction, and internal rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    That resembles lower PL5 or an inguinal point, which have different landmarks.

  2. B. A painful straight-leg stretch maintained for 90 seconds. (Why this does not fit)

    A provocative stretch is not the monitored position of ease.

  3. C. Flexion, abduction, and external rotation. (Best answer)

    This follows the piriformis position, commonly with substantial flexion near 120 degrees as tolerated.

  4. D. Extension, adduction, and no flexion. (Why this does not fit)

    That is unlike the piriformis flexion-based prescription.

Takeaway: Piriformis positioning follows comfort after identifying the correct monitor.

Case sources: [2] [3]

Case 19

A patient has buttock tenderness and posterior thigh symptoms. A straight-leg raise is negative, but ankle dorsiflexion weakness is new. What is the best next decision?

Show answer and explanations for case 19
  1. A. Repeat deep pressure until strength returns. (Why this does not fit)

    Pressure at the monitor is not a treatment for unexplained weakness.

  2. B. Assess weakness; do not assume a piriformis cause. (Best answer)

    New weakness changes the diagnostic priority; a negative straight-leg raise does not settle the cause.

  3. C. Diagnose piriformis entrapment solely from the tender point. (Why this does not fit)

    A localized point is not sufficient to explain a new motor deficit.

  4. D. Use tenderness relief to rule out a neurologic disorder. (Why this does not fit)

    A local pain response cannot exclude a coexisting neurologic lesion.

Takeaway: A tender point does not supersede a neurologic examination.

Case sources: [2] [3] [6]

Case 20

A high ilium sacroiliac monitor lies two to three centimeters lateral to the PSIS in the gluteus maximus attachment region. Which initial position matches HISI?

Show answer and explanations for case 20
  1. A. Hip extension with slight abduction. (Best answer)

    This matches the HISI position and location.

  2. B. Marked hip flexion with abduction and external rotation. (Why this does not fit)

    That would resemble piriformis, whose monitor is farther toward the greater trochanter.

  3. C. Hip extension and adduction at the lateral coccyx. (Why this does not fit)

    That is the HIFO region and prescription, not HISI.

  4. D. Lumbar flexion with rotation away at the pubis. (Why this does not fit)

    That is an anterior lumbar pattern with a different landmark.

Takeaway: HISI is a PSIS-adjacent gluteal-region point, not a piriformis synonym.

Case sources: [2]

Case 21

A monitor is lateral to the sacral ILA, approximately ten centimeters inferior to the PSIS, and labeled MPSI or FOSI. Which initial approach is appropriate?

Show answer and explanations for case 21
  1. A. Treat the midpoint from sacrum to greater trochanter instead. (Why this does not fit)

    That substitutes a different monitor.

  2. B. Use maximal internal rotation because every sacroiliac point requires it. (Why this does not fit)

    There is no universal internal-rotation rule for these points.

  3. C. Use AL1 trunk positioning because the point is near the pelvis. (Why this does not fit)

    AL1 is an anterior ASIS-region point and is not identified by this landmark.

  4. D. Hip abduction with a small flexion or extension adjustment for ease. (Best answer)

    That follows the MPSI prescription without imposing a piriformis midpoint coordinate.

Takeaway: A sacral-margin monitor differs from a lateral gluteal midpoint.

Case sources: [2]

Case 22

A HIFO monitor is identified lateral to the coccyx. A learner chooses abduction because the label says “flare out.” Which correction is appropriate?

Show answer and explanations for case 22
  1. A. Relabel the point AL5 without changing its posterior location. (Why this does not fit)

    AL5 is on the anterior pubic ramus, not lateral to the coccyx.

  2. B. Use a midline spinous-process monitor instead. (Why this does not fit)

    That changes the anatomical target rather than correcting this setup.

  3. C. Assess hip extension and adduction, with external rotation as needed for ease. (Best answer)

    The taught HIFO prescription is not derived from the everyday meaning of its name.

  4. D. Continue abduction because the label determines the direction. (Why this does not fit)

    The mnemonic inference conflicts with the verified position.

Takeaway: A point name is not a substitute for its anatomical prescription.

Case sources: [2]

Case 23

A lateral PL3 monitor is identified near the iliac crest between PSIS and the posterior tensor fasciae latae region. Which position fits the gluteus medius map?

Show answer and explanations for case 23
  1. A. Hip flexion, adduction, and internal rotation for lower PL5. (Why this does not fit)

    Lower PL5 lies immediately inferior to the PSIS, not at the lateral gluteal coordinate.

  2. B. Hip extension, abduction, and external rotation. (Best answer)

    This matches the lateral PL3/PL4 region described in the posterior pelvic handout.

  3. C. Midline lumbar extension alone because PL3 always means the spinous process. (Why this does not fit)

    The stem explicitly identifies the lateral pelvic monitor.

  4. D. Bilateral marked hip flexion for the iliacus point. (Why this does not fit)

    The iliacus monitor is anterior in the iliac fossa.

Takeaway: Lateral PL3/PL4 labels identify a different map from midline lumbar points.

Case sources: [2]

Case 24

A patient has a quadratus-lumborum-region monitor near the inferior twelfth rib, with a second sensitive region at the iliac crest. Which combination matches the POFPS teaching description?

Show answer and explanations for case 24
  1. A. Hip extension, abduction, and external rotation, guided by lumbar comfort. (Best answer)

    The twelfth-rib and iliac-crest relationship fits quadratus lumborum and its taught initial position.

  2. B. Bilateral hip flexion and adduction for an inguinal point. (Why this does not fit)

    The landmark is posterior between the rib and crest, not near the pubic tubercle.

  3. C. Hip flexion and internal rotation solely because all lumbar pain is anterior lumbar dysfunction. (Why this does not fit)

    Lumbar symptoms do not determine the monitor's anatomical category.

  4. D. A forced stretch separating the rib and crest until pain increases. (Why this does not fit)

    Counterstrain seeks ease rather than painful lengthening.

Takeaway: Attachment relationships distinguish quadratus lumborum from PSIS-based points.

Case sources: [3]

Case 25

A verified monitor is at the superolateral posterior aspect of the greater trochanter. Which initial position matches the ATSU posterolateral trochanteric description?

Show answer and explanations for case 25
  1. A. Abduction with slight flexion for a point twelve centimeters below the trochanter. (Why this does not fit)

    That is the lateral iliotibial-band-region monitor, not the specified posterior trochanter.

  2. B. Hip adduction based on an unspecified posteromedial label. (Why this does not fit)

    The stem supplies a verified posterolateral coordinate; an ambiguous label should not replace it.

  3. C. Bilateral hip flexion for a point medial to the ASIS. (Why this does not fit)

    That position belongs to a different anterior region.

  4. D. Hip extension, slight abduction, and external rotation as tolerated. (Best answer)

    This corresponds to the explicitly identified posterolateral trochanteric point.

Takeaway: Trochanteric labels require both surface direction and distance.

Case sources: [1]

Case 26

A copied instruction gives a “low ilium inflare” label but supplies conflicting pubic coordinates and opposite rotations in two paragraphs. No matching verified atlas entry is available. What should the clinician do?

Show answer and explanations for case 26
  1. A. Use whichever position causes the most tenderness. (Why this does not fit)

    Provoking pain is not a way to validate the missing prescription.

  2. B. Treat both recipes consecutively without identifying the point. (Why this does not fit)

    Repeating uncertain positioning does not resolve the anatomical ambiguity.

  3. C. Verify the monitor and atlas description before positioning. (Best answer)

    The label does not resolve contradictory coordinates or justify inventing a mirrored technique.

  4. D. Reverse every direction from any outflare point. (Why this does not fit)

    A name does not establish a mirror-image anatomical relationship.

Takeaway: Uncertain nomenclature requires clarification, not an invented recipe.

Case sources: [1] [2]

Case 27

A patient has postoperative hip precautions prohibiting a proposed flexion-adduction position. The clinician is considering lower PL5 counterstrain. What is the appropriate decision?

Show answer and explanations for case 27
  1. A. Ask the patient to hold the position actively so it becomes safe. (Why this does not fit)

    Active effort does not cancel postoperative positioning restrictions.

  2. B. Honor precautions; choose another assessment or treatment. (Best answer)

    The proposed position conflicts with known tissue-protection requirements.

  3. C. Ignore the precautions because counterstrain is indirect. (Why this does not fit)

    Indirect positioning can still place vulnerable tissue at risk.

  4. D. Use greater flexion to shorten the treatment time. (Why this does not fit)

    Greater flexion violates the restriction and does not justify a shorter hold.

Takeaway: Technique labels do not override patient-specific positioning limits.

Case sources: [1] [3] [5]

Search Bone Wizardry

Quick links