⌘ KStart free
0%
Skip to lesson

Neurology

Headaches

Use onset, duration, associated symptoms, and examination to distinguish primary headaches from vascular, inflammatory, infectious, and pressure emergencies.

Two patients describe the worst headache they have experienced. One has a familiar attack that grew over an hour; the other reached maximum pain while lifting a box. Severity matters, but the time to peak changes the immediate decision. Establish the onset before assigning a headache name.

A normal neurologic examination does not make every headache benign. Conversely, a stable recurrent migraine pattern with a normal examination does not require imaging solely for reassurance. The task is to identify the pattern and the features that fall outside it. [1]

First determine which clock you are reading

Ask separately about time to maximum pain, duration of an untreated attack, and frequency over months. Thunderclap describes abrupt peak intensity, usually within one minute; it is an onset pattern, not a final diagnosis. New focal deficits, altered consciousness, fever with meningismus, papilledema, a major pattern change, cancer or immunosuppression, pregnancy or the postpartum period, and a new headache after age 50 require attention to secondary causes. New cough-, exertion-, or sex-triggered pain also warrants evaluation before a primary diagnosis. [1] [2]

Time to peak

Seconds to a minute: investigate hemorrhage and other vascular causes. The later duration does not cancel this onset.

Duration of one attack

Seconds: consider neuralgia. Fifteen to 180 minutes: consider cluster. Four to 72 hours: consider migraine. Thirty minutes to seven days: tension-type remains possible.

Calendar pattern

Count headache days, migraine-feature days, and acute medicine days separately. Daily pain is not automatically chronic migraine.

Three clocks answer different questions. Duration ranges overlap and must be combined with symptoms and examination; they are not diagnostic by themselves. [2] [3] [4]

A headache diary can record disability, menstruation, associated symptoms, and treatment response without turning an emergency into a home observation exercise. A familiar migraine history does not protect someone from a new secondary headache.

Migraine and tension-type pain differ by the whole attack

Migraine without aura typically lasts four to 72 hours untreated. The diagnostic pattern combines at least two of unilateral pain, pulsating quality, moderate or severe intensity, and aggravation by routine activity, plus nausea/vomiting or both photophobia and phonophobia. Thus migraine can be bilateral, can occur without nausea, and need not include an aura. Established diagnosis generally requires at least five qualifying attacks and exclusion of a better explanation. [3]

Typical aura consists of fully reversible visual, sensory, or language symptoms that often spread gradually or occur in succession. Each typical nonmotor symptom commonly lasts five to 60 minutes. A spreading scintillating pattern followed by headache differs from a sudden fixed field defect, but these descriptions are not perfectly specific. A first, abrupt, persistent, or otherwise atypical neurologic deficit needs evaluation for stroke or another cause. Aura can occur without headache. [5]

Migraine involves trigeminovascular signaling, not simply a large artery dilating. Trigeminal afferents convey pain from cranial structures, and CGRP participates in the signaling network. A human provocation trial showed that administered CGRP can trigger migraine-like attacks in susceptible participants. This supports a therapeutic target without reducing a complex brain disorder to a single peptide. [6]

Episodic tension-type headache is usually bilateral, pressing or tightening, mild to moderate, and not worsened by ordinary activity. Nausea and vomiting are absent; no more than one of photophobia or phonophobia is present. Stress or pericranial tenderness may coexist but does not prove the diagnosis. Marked activity avoidance with both light and sound sensitivity should prompt reconsideration of migraine. [2]

For an established migraine attack, an appropriate triptan with an NSAID or paracetamol is one guideline-supported approach; an antiemetic and a nonoral route may help when vomiting limits absorption. Contraindications, pregnancy, vascular disease, and prior response affect selection. For tension-type attacks, simple analgesics may help. Avoid opioids as routine treatment for either pattern. Oxygen is a standard acute treatment for cluster headache, not routine migraine therapy. [1]

Cluster pain recruits a same-sided autonomic response

Cluster headache produces very severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital, or temporal pain lasting 15 to 180 minutes untreated, with ipsilateral autonomic findings and/or restlessness. Attacks may recur from every other day to eight times daily during an active period. Tearing, conjunctival injection, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, eyelid edema, ptosis, or miosis can accompany the pain. The patient may pace rather than seek the stillness often preferred during migraine. Migraine can also cause cranial autonomic symptoms, so tearing alone does not establish cluster. [4] [3]

Sensory limb: trigeminal input from the painful cranial region reaches brainstem pain circuits.

Parasympathetic limb: superior salivatory nucleus output travels with facial-nerve pathways through the greater petrosal pathway to the pterygopalatine, also called sphenopalatine, ganglion.

Same-sided target tissues: postganglionic output to lacrimal and nasal tissues helps explain tearing and rhinorrhea.

Separate sympathetic finding: reduced oculosympathetic function explains ptosis and miosis; these are not direct lacrimal parasympathetic effects.

The pain and autonomic components share a reflex circuit, but the signs arise from different efferent functions. This schematic separates those functions without implying that all cluster biology is peripheral. [7] [18]

Treat an acute cluster attack with 100% oxygen at a flow of at least 12 L/min through a non-rebreather mask with reservoir and/or a subcutaneous or nasal triptan when appropriate. Oral agents are generally too slow for this brief severe attack. Verapamil is a preventive option with specialist advice and ECG monitoring during dose adjustment. Discuss neuroimaging for a first cluster bout; a persistent Horner syndrome, atypical examination, or changed pattern should not be dismissed as another cluster feature. [1]

Hemorrhage and arteritis demand different urgent decisions

Thunderclap and subarachnoid hemorrhage

Obtain urgent noncontrast CT when subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is suspected. AHA/ASA guidance distinguishes selected patients presenting within six hours without a new neurologic deficit, when a high-quality scan interpreted by a neuroradiologist can be sufficient, from those presenting later or with a new deficit. In the latter group, a negative CT should be followed by lumbar puncture when appropriate to diagnose or exclude SAH. A negative scan is not a universal stopping rule. [8]

Once aneurysmal SAH is identified, specialist care includes securing the aneurysm and managing complications. Enteral nimodipine reduces delayed cerebral ischemia and improves functional outcomes; it does not repair the aneurysm. A first sex- or exercise-associated thunderclap requires the same initial seriousness. Recurrent thunderclaps over days can indicate reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), and vascular imaging can be normal early. Persistent clinical concern may require reassessment and repeat vascular imaging rather than a premature primary-thunderclap label. [8] [2]

Giant cell arteritis and threatened vision

In an adult over 50, new headache with jaw claudication, scalp tenderness, constitutional symptoms, polymyalgia symptoms, or visual disturbance should raise concern for giant cell arteritis (GCA). It is a large- and medium-vessel inflammatory disorder; the temporal artery is a diagnostic target, not the only vessel involved. Ocular ischemia can cause irreversible visual loss. ESR and CRP support assessment but neither establishes nor absolutely excludes the diagnosis. [9] [10] [22]

When suspicion is high, begin glucocorticoids promptly while arranging confirmation and urgent specialist assessment. ACR/Vasculitis Foundation guidance conditionally favors IV pulse glucocorticoids over high-dose oral treatment for newly diagnosed GCA with threatened vision loss; without cranial ischemia, it conditionally favors high-dose oral treatment over IV pulses. These recommendations have low or very low certainty, so the patient's ischemic risk and treatment risks matter. Do not prescribe IV pulses for every older patient with a headache. Obtain a temporal artery biopsy promptly, preferably within two weeks after starting glucocorticoids when biopsy is the chosen test; later biopsy can still be informative. Local expertise affects the role of vascular ultrasound. [9]

Long-term care includes an individualized glucocorticoid taper, monitoring for relapse and treatment toxicity, and consideration of steroid-sparing treatment such as tocilizumab. ACR/VF conditionally recommends baseline noninvasive vascular imaging in newly diagnosed GCA to assess large-vessel involvement. When that involvement is present, follow-up imaging can monitor aneurysms and stenoses; repeated imaging is not automatically required on one fixed schedule for every patient. [9]

Look beyond the five familiar headache labels

Fever, neck stiffness, headache, and altered cognition raise concern for bacterial meningitis. All features need not be present, and absence of a rash does not identify or exclude an organism. Obtain cultures and CSF when safe, but do not delay needed antibiotics for imaging or an unsafe lumbar puncture. A neutrophilic CSF pattern with low glucose supports bacterial disease; viral disease more often has lymphocytes and preserved glucose, with exceptions and organism-specific testing required. [11] [19]

Headache with papilledema, transient visual obscurations, or pulsatile tinnitus warrants evaluation for raised intracranial pressure. MRI and venous imaging help exclude a mass and cerebral venous thrombosis before lumbar puncture. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) requires the appropriate clinical, imaging, and CSF findings, not obesity alone. Tetracyclines and other implicated medicines can produce secondary intracranial hypertension. Assess visual fields and protect vision; weight management in typical IIH and acetazolamide may be useful. Serial lumbar punctures are not routine long-term headache treatment. Declining vision needs urgent specialist escalation. [12]

Fever, painful ophthalmoplegia, proptosis, and chemosis after facial or sinus infection raise concern for orbital infection or cavernous sinus thrombosis. Contrast imaging with appropriate venous assessment distinguishes extension and thrombosis; symptoms alone cannot settle the anatomy. Progressive headache with a new seizure or focal deficit also needs structural imaging. Ring enhancement describes an imaging pattern, not a histologic diagnosis: specialist assessment may need advanced MRI and tissue diagnosis. [13] [21] [14]

Seconds-long electric pain triggered by touching the cheek or chewing suggests trigeminal neuralgia, especially when localized to a trigeminal division. It is not simply a short migraine. A painful red eye with blurred vision, a poorly reactive pupil, or corneal haze requires urgent assessment for angle closure; orbital pain alone should not be labeled cluster. [17] New cough headache can reflect a posterior fossa or craniocervical lesion; a primary cough diagnosis follows adequate exclusion of secondary disease. [2]

Count days before changing long-term treatment

Chronic migraine requires headache on at least 15 days per month for more than three months, with migraine features on at least eight days per month in a person with the requisite migraine history. Status migrainosus is a debilitating migraine attack lasting more than 72 hours, with specified allowances for brief remissions. These describe different dimensions: a prolonged attack does not by itself establish chronic migraine. [2]

Medication-overuse headache requires headache on at least 15 days per month in a person with a pre-existing headache disorder, together with regular excessive acute medication use for more than three months. Thresholds depend on the drug: triptans, opioids, and combination analgesics generally use at least 10 days per month; simple nonopioid analgesics generally use at least 15. Count medication days rather than tablets. Chronic migraine and medication overuse can coexist. Withdrawal planning, support, and effective prevention should address both. [2] [1]

Frequent tension-type headache also deserves review of sleep, stress, analgesic exposure, and prevention. Amitriptyline is a preventive option for chronic tension-type headache in appropriate patients, with attention to anticholinergic effects, cardiac risk, and local prescribing guidance. It is not an immediate attack treatment. [20]

Discuss prevention when attacks cause substantial disability, are frequent, or acute therapy is ineffective or overused. Options include propranolol, topiramate, amitriptyline, and CGRP-targeting therapies, chosen around patient goals and contraindications. The 2024 American Headache Society position allows CGRP-targeting therapies as a first-line preventive option without requiring prior failures; access rules may differ. Topiramate has important pregnancy restrictions. Migraine with aura also changes contraceptive counseling: combined hormonal contraception is US MEC category 4, while other methods may be suitable after full assessment. [1] [15] [16]

Practice choosing the next headache decision

Case 1

A 32-year-old has had eight attacks of pulsating unilateral pain lasting 12 to 24 hours. Climbing stairs worsens the pain, and she has nausea and light sensitivity. Examination between attacks is normal. Which diagnosis best fits?

Show answer and explanations for case 1
  1. A. Cluster headache (Why this does not fit)

    Cluster attacks are usually shorter and prominently orbital with autonomic signs or restlessness.

  2. B. Episodic tension-type headache (Why this does not fit)

    Nausea and activity-aggravated pulsating pain argue against this pattern.

  3. C. Trigeminal neuralgia (Why this does not fit)

    Neuralgia causes brief triggered electric pains rather than these prolonged attacks.

  4. D. Migraine without aura (Best answer)

    Duration, activity aggravation, pulsation, and nausea form the migraine pattern; aura is not required.

Takeaway: Migraine is a combination of features, not a requirement for aura.

Case sources: [3] [4] [2]

Case 2

A student has recurrent moderate bilateral pulsating headaches lasting six hours. Walking worsens them, and both light and sound are unpleasant. There is no nausea or aura. Which conclusion is best?

Show answer and explanations for case 2
  1. A. Absence of nausea establishes tension-type headache (Why this does not fit)

    Both photophobia and phonophobia with activity-aggravated pulsating pain support migraine.

  2. B. Aura is required before migraine can be diagnosed (Why this does not fit)

    Migraine without aura is a defined and common subtype.

  3. C. Migraine remains compatible with this pattern (Best answer)

    Bilateral location and absent nausea do not exclude migraine when sufficient pain features and both photo- and phonophobia are present.

  4. D. Bilateral pain excludes migraine (Why this does not fit)

    Unilateral location is one possible feature, not an absolute requirement.

Takeaway: Avoid requiring every stereotyped migraine feature in every attack.

Case sources: [3]

Case 3

A 27-year-old has several stereotyped attacks in which shimmering zigzags spread across vision over ten minutes, resolve by 25 minutes, and are followed by a throbbing headache. What best describes the visual episode?

Show answer and explanations for case 3
  1. A. Occipital seizure (Why this does not fit)

    Visual seizures are often briefer and have a different temporal pattern. Gradual spreading positive symptoms lasting 25 minutes followed by the usual headache favor visual aura here.

  2. B. Typical visual aura (Best answer)

    Gradual spread, positive visual symptoms, reversibility, and this duration fit the aura pattern.

  3. C. Persistent homonymous hemianopia from completed infarction (Why this does not fit)

    The visual symptom fully resolves and evolves gradually rather than remaining fixed.

  4. D. Papilledema-related transient visual obscuration (Why this does not fit)

    Those episodes are often brief dimming rather than a spreading scintillating pattern lasting 25 minutes.

Takeaway: Describe the evolution and reversibility of a neurologic symptom before calling it aura.

Case sources: [5] [12]

Case 4

A patient with prior visual aura develops sudden right arm weakness and aphasia that remain present 50 minutes later. This has never occurred during prior attacks. What is the best action?

Show answer and explanations for case 4
  1. A. Activate urgent stroke evaluation (Best answer)

    A new abrupt persistent focal deficit needs vascular assessment even in someone with migraine.

  2. B. Observe for another hour to see whether the symptoms resolve like an aura (Why this does not fit)

    New abrupt persistent motor and language deficits require immediate stroke evaluation. Waiting for resolution can lose a treatment opportunity.

  3. C. Give the usual migraine rescue medication and reassess tomorrow (Why this does not fit)

    A prior migraine diagnosis does not establish the cause of a new deficit. Rescue treatment must not replace urgent evaluation for stroke.

  4. D. Arrange an outpatient MRI because the patient has had visual aura before (Why this does not fit)

    An outpatient pathway is too slow for abrupt ongoing focal deficits. This pattern needs an acute stroke assessment.

Takeaway: A migraine history does not rule out stroke.

Case sources: [1] [5]

Case 5

A 41-year-old has a bilateral pressing headache after a long workday. It is mild, does not worsen on a walk, and causes neither nausea nor light or sound sensitivity. Similar episodes last two hours. Which diagnosis is most likely?

Show answer and explanations for case 5
  1. A. Cluster headache (Why this does not fit)

    There is no severe unilateral orbital pain, autonomic pattern, or brief clustered timing.

  2. B. Migraine with aura (Why this does not fit)

    Neither aura nor the usual migraine-associated symptom combination is present.

  3. C. Subarachnoid hemorrhage (Why this does not fit)

    The stable recurrent gradual pattern lacks the acute onset that would raise this concern.

  4. D. Episodic tension-type headache (Best answer)

    The mild pressing quality, lack of activity aggravation, and absence of migraine-associated symptoms fit.

Takeaway: Tension-type headache is defined by the attack pattern, not by stress alone.

Case sources: [2]

Case 6

A patient with established migraine presents with a usual eight-hour attack and nausea. There are no new warning findings or relevant medication contraindications. Which acute option is most appropriate?

Show answer and explanations for case 6
  1. A. Verapamil solely to stop the current attack within minutes (Why this does not fit)

    Verapamil is used preventively in cluster care and is not an immediate migraine abortive.

  2. B. Daily opioids as the preferred long-term response (Why this does not fit)

    Opioids are not routine first-line migraine treatment and increase medication-related risks.

  3. C. A suitable triptan with an NSAID and an antiemetic when needed (Best answer)

    This is a guideline-supported migraine approach tailored to tolerance and prior response.

  4. D. High-flow oxygen as the routine migraine-specific first choice (Why this does not fit)

    Oxygen is a standard acute cluster treatment, not routine migraine therapy.

Takeaway: Match acute therapy to the established headache phenotype.

Case sources: [1]

Case 7

A 38-year-old paces during excruciating left orbital pain lasting 45 minutes. The left eye tears and the nostril runs. Attacks occur twice nightly for three weeks. What is the best diagnosis?

Show answer and explanations for case 7
  1. A. Giant cell arteritis (Why this does not fit)

    The age and repeated short autonomic attacks favor cluster rather than a new inflammatory ischemic syndrome.

  2. B. Cluster headache (Best answer)

    The attack duration, orbital location, ipsilateral autonomic findings, restlessness, and clustered recurrence align.

  3. C. Tension-type headache (Why this does not fit)

    The intensity and autonomic orbital pattern are inconsistent with the usual tension-type attack.

  4. D. Trigeminal neuralgia (Why this does not fit)

    Neuralgic paroxysms are typically much briefer and triggered by innocuous facial stimuli.

Takeaway: Combine duration, behavior, and same-sided autonomic signs when recognizing cluster.

Case sources: [4] [2] [9]

Case 8

A patient with a previously evaluated cluster headache syndrome arrives during a typical attack. Oxygen therapy is selected. Which delivery method matches guidance?

Show answer and explanations for case 8
  1. A. 100% oxygen at at least 12 L/min through a non-rebreather mask with reservoir (Best answer)

    The high flow and delivery system are essential components of the recommended acute therapy.

  2. B. Oxygen at 2 L/min through nasal prongs (Why this does not fit)

    Low-flow nasal oxygen does not match the recommended cluster regimen. The high-flow reservoir system delivers the concentration used to abort attacks.

  3. C. A low-flow nasal cannula only if saturation is below 90% (Why this does not fit)

    Cluster oxygen is an attack treatment and does not depend on hypoxemia.

  4. D. 100% oxygen at 2 L/min through a non-rebreather mask (Why this does not fit)

    The stated flow is inadequate for the recommended cluster treatment. Guidance specifies at least 12 L/min with a reservoir non-rebreather system.

Takeaway: The mask and flow are part of the cluster prescription.

Case sources: [1]

Case 9

A patient with cluster headache needs prevention during an active bout. Verapamil is being titrated. Which monitoring is especially relevant?

Show answer and explanations for case 9
  1. A. Serial liver enzymes as the principal check during each dose increase (Why this does not fit)

    Drug-specific monitoring matters. For verapamil titration in cluster headache, ECG surveillance addresses atrioventricular conduction effects that liver enzymes cannot detect.

  2. B. Blood-pressure monitoring without ECG assessment (Why this does not fit)

    Blood pressure is useful but does not assess conduction block. ECG monitoring remains relevant as verapamil is increased.

  3. C. Serum verapamil concentrations instead of ECG monitoring (Why this does not fit)

    Routine serum levels are not the recommended substitute for assessing cardiac conduction during dose adjustment.

  4. D. ECG assessment for conduction effects during dose adjustment (Best answer)

    Verapamil can affect cardiac conduction, so specialist titration includes ECG monitoring.

Takeaway: Preventive treatment has its own safety requirements.

Case sources: [1]

Case 10

During a cluster attack, a patient has tearing and rhinorrhea on the painful side. Which pathway most directly produces these secretory signs?

Show answer and explanations for case 10
  1. A. Sympathetic fibers traveling with the internal carotid artery (Why this does not fit)

    This pathway is relevant to ocular sympathetic function and Horner findings. Facial parasympathetic output through the pterygopalatine ganglion more directly accounts for tearing and nasal secretion.

  2. B. Oculomotor parasympathetic fibers through the ciliary ganglion (Why this does not fit)

    This pathway controls pupillary constriction and accommodation. It does not provide the principal secretomotor supply to lacrimal and nasal glands.

  3. C. Facial-nerve parasympathetic output through the pterygopalatine ganglion (Best answer)

    This outflow supplies lacrimal and nasal secretory tissues.

  4. D. Glossopharyngeal parasympathetic fibers through the otic ganglion (Why this does not fit)

    That pathway supplies the parotid gland. The lacrimal and nasal secretory response uses the facial-nerve pterygopalatine pathway.

Takeaway: Cluster secretory signs reflect a cranial parasympathetic response.

Case sources: [7] [18]

Case 11

A patient with migraine has unilateral tearing during a 16-hour pulsating attack with nausea and a preference to lie still. Does tearing establish cluster headache?

Show answer and explanations for case 11
  1. A. No; the tearing instead favors paroxysmal hemicrania over migraine (Why this does not fit)

    Paroxysmal hemicrania produces frequent, much shorter attacks. The 16-hour pulsating nauseating attack with preference for rest still favors migraine.

  2. B. No; cranial autonomic symptoms can accompany migraine, and the whole attack still favors migraine (Best answer)

    Long duration, nausea, and activity avoidance remain informative.

  3. C. Yes; tearing never occurs in migraine (Why this does not fit)

    That absolute distinction is false.

  4. D. Yes; the autonomic finding should outweigh the attack duration (Why this does not fit)

    Tearing is not exclusive to cluster. Duration, associated symptoms and behavior must be interpreted together, and this prolonged attack favors migraine.

Takeaway: Autonomic symptoms are useful but not exclusive to cluster headache.

Case sources: [3] [4]

Case 12

A 56-year-old experiences maximal headache intensity within seconds while carrying groceries. Examination is initially normal. What is the most appropriate initial investigation for suspected SAH?

Show answer and explanations for case 12
  1. A. Urgent noncontrast head CT (Best answer)

    Abrupt maximal onset warrants prompt assessment for hemorrhage despite a normal examination.

  2. B. A routine outpatient headache diary before imaging (Why this does not fit)

    A diary cannot exclude an acute hemorrhage.

  3. C. Elective temporal artery biopsy (Why this does not fit)

    The onset pattern directs the initial evaluation toward hemorrhage rather than GCA.

  4. D. No investigation if an analgesic reduces the pain (Why this does not fit)

    Pain relief does not exclude SAH.

Takeaway: Time to peak can determine urgency even without a focal deficit.

Case sources: [8]

Case 13

A patient presents 18 hours after a thunderclap headache. Noncontrast CT is negative, but suspicion for SAH remains and lumbar puncture is safe. What does AHA/ASA guidance recommend next?

Show answer and explanations for case 13
  1. A. Exclude SAH because any negative CT is definitive (Why this does not fit)

    CT interpretation depends on timing and clinical context.

  2. B. Start routine migraine prevention and end the investigation (Why this does not fit)

    A preventive prescription does not resolve a possible hemorrhage.

  3. C. Repeat the neurologic examination in a month (Why this does not fit)

    Persistent concern for SAH requires an urgent diagnostic response.

  4. D. Lumbar puncture to help diagnose or exclude SAH (Best answer)

    The later presentation falls outside the selected early-CT stopping pathway.

Takeaway: A negative CT after delayed presentation may leave an important diagnostic gap.

Case sources: [8]

Case 14

A neurologically intact adult undergoes high-quality noncontrast CT two hours after a thunderclap headache. A neuroradiologist interprets it as normal. Which statement best reflects the selected early-CT pathway?

Show answer and explanations for case 14
  1. A. Normal CT excludes RCVS, venous thrombosis, and meningitis as well (Why this does not fit)

    The SAH pathway does not automatically exclude all secondary causes.

  2. B. CT angiography is mandatory after every adequate early negative CT in this selected population (Why this does not fit)

    The AHA/ASA pathway allows an adequate early CT to exclude aneurysmal SAH in the specified neurologically intact population. Further testing depends on the clinical concern and other possible causes.

  3. C. This can be sufficient to exclude aneurysmal SAH in the specified setting, while other causes still require clinical consideration (Best answer)

    The recommendation depends on timing, scan quality, interpretation, and no new deficit.

  4. D. The same conclusion applies to every negative CT obtained several days later (Why this does not fit)

    The early timing is central to the evidence.

Takeaway: Know the conditions and limits of the early-CT approach.

Case sources: [8] [2] [12]

Case 15

After aneurysmal SAH is diagnosed, a patient receives enteral nimodipine while the team plans aneurysm treatment. What is nimodipine intended to do?

Show answer and explanations for case 15
  1. A. Prevent early rebleeding by reducing systemic blood pressure (Why this does not fit)

    Nimodipine's established role is reducing delayed cerebral ischemia and improving outcome. Preventing rebleeding requires aneurysm-directed management and appropriate hemodynamic care.

  2. B. Reduce delayed cerebral ischemia and improve functional outcome (Best answer)

    It addresses a secondary complication of SAH alongside definitive aneurysm care.

  3. C. Replace clipping or coiling as definitive aneurysm treatment (Why this does not fit)

    Nimodipine does not secure the aneurysm. Aneurysm treatment and delayed-ischemia prevention address different risks.

  4. D. Treat acute obstructive hydrocephalus (Why this does not fit)

    Hydrocephalus requires separate evaluation and, when indicated, CSF diversion. Nimodipine's principal role is prevention of delayed cerebral ischemia.

Takeaway: Nimodipine complements, rather than substitutes for, aneurysm treatment.

Case sources: [8]

Case 16

A postpartum patient has four thunderclap headaches over six days, sometimes triggered by a hot shower. The initial CT angiogram on day one was normal. Which interpretation is most appropriate?

Show answer and explanations for case 16
  1. A. RCVS remains possible and warrants specialist reassessment, including repeat vascular imaging when indicated (Best answer)

    Early angiography may be normal before vasoconstriction becomes demonstrable.

  2. B. The initial angiogram permanently excludes RCVS (Why this does not fit)

    The vascular abnormalities may appear later.

  3. C. Treat as primary sexual or exertional headache without further vascular assessment (Why this does not fit)

    Recurrent thunderclaps, especially postpartum, warrant evaluation for RCVS and other vascular disease. A benign primary trigger diagnosis cannot replace that assessment.

  4. D. Exclude a vascular cause because several episodes resolved between attacks (Why this does not fit)

    Resolution between thunderclaps does not exclude RCVS. Vascular narrowing may evolve and initial imaging can be normal.

Takeaway: Recurrent thunderclap pain can require reassessment after an initially normal vascular study.

Case sources: [2]

Case 17

A 44-year-old has a first explosive headache at orgasm. Pain improves over an hour, and the examination is normal. What is the best next step?

Show answer and explanations for case 17
  1. A. Diagnose primary sexual headache solely from the trigger (Why this does not fit)

    The trigger does not establish benignity.

  2. B. Exclude hemorrhage because the pain has improved (Why this does not fit)

    Improvement does not reliably exclude bleeding.

  3. C. Schedule routine migraine follow-up without acute investigation (Why this does not fit)

    A first explosive headache requires urgent evaluation even when the examination is normal. The sexual trigger does not establish a primary headache.

  4. D. Urgent evaluation for secondary vascular causes before labeling primary sexual headache (Best answer)

    First abrupt sex-associated pain requires exclusion of disorders such as SAH and RCVS.

Takeaway: An exertional or sexual trigger does not make thunderclap headache safe.

Case sources: [2] [8]

Case 18

A 73-year-old develops a new headache, pain in the jaw while chewing, and two episodes of transient monocular visual loss. What should happen while diagnostic confirmation is arranged?

Show answer and explanations for case 18
  1. A. Use only an NSAID because the headache is recent (Why this does not fit)

    Analgesia does not adequately treat the suspected arteritis.

  2. B. Treat as migraine aura without considering age or monocular loss (Why this does not fit)

    The new late-life ischemic pattern requires a different evaluation.

  3. C. Urgent specialist and eye assessment with prompt glucocorticoid treatment for strongly suspected GCA (Best answer)

    Jaw claudication and ischemic visual symptoms create concern for preventable further visual loss.

  4. D. Wait for biopsy results before any treatment (Why this does not fit)

    Delaying treatment can expose the other eye or remaining vision to ischemia.

Takeaway: Suspected GCA with visual symptoms is a treatment and diagnostic emergency.

Case sources: [9] [10]

Case 19

A patient with newly diagnosed GCA has headache and scalp tenderness but no visual symptoms or other cranial ischemia. Which initial steroid strategy is generally favored by ACR/VF guidance?

Show answer and explanations for case 19
  1. A. Moderate-dose oral glucocorticoids as the default for all newly diagnosed patients (Why this does not fit)

    ACR/VF conditionally favors high-dose over moderate-dose initial oral treatment in general. Lower dosing may be considered for selected toxicity-risk circumstances, which are not given here.

  2. B. High-dose oral glucocorticoids (Best answer)

    Without cranial ischemia, guidance generally favors oral treatment rather than routine IV pulses.

  3. C. IV pulse glucocorticoids for every GCA patient regardless of phenotype (Why this does not fit)

    IV pulses are conditionally favored particularly for threatened vision, not universally.

  4. D. Tocilizumab alone without initial glucocorticoids (Why this does not fit)

    Guidance supports considering tocilizumab with glucocorticoids, rather than replacing initial glucocorticoid treatment with tocilizumab alone.

Takeaway: GCA steroid route depends on ischemic risk, especially threatened vision.

Case sources: [9]

Case 20

A patient started glucocorticoids yesterday for strongly suspected GCA. A biopsy can be obtained in five days. What is the best interpretation?

Show answer and explanations for case 20
  1. A. Proceed promptly; biopsy can remain diagnostic after treatment has begun (Best answer)

    Guidance favors biopsy within two weeks when feasible rather than withholding necessary steroids.

  2. B. Cancel because one steroid dose always erases histology (Why this does not fit)

    Histologic findings may persist after treatment starts.

  3. C. Stop steroids until the biopsy to restore diagnostic accuracy (Why this does not fit)

    That may expose the patient to avoidable ischemic risk.

  4. D. Wait six months because timing has no effect on yield (Why this does not fit)

    Earlier sampling generally offers better diagnostic yield.

Takeaway: Treatment and timely confirmation can proceed together.

Case sources: [9]

Case 21

A 76-year-old has new scalp tenderness and jaw claudication. ESR is within the laboratory reference range. Which conclusion is most appropriate?

Show answer and explanations for case 21
  1. A. A normal ESR definitively rules out GCA (Why this does not fit)

    No single normal inflammatory marker provides that certainty.

  2. B. Defer confirmation unless the ESR rises on a later sample (Why this does not fit)

    A normal ESR cannot safely override a concerning clinical syndrome. Confirmation and treatment decisions should be based on the full assessment.

  3. C. Confirm GCA from the symptoms alone and omit biopsy or vascular imaging (Why this does not fit)

    Clinical suspicion can justify prompt treatment, but the ESR and symptoms do not make confirmatory evaluation unnecessary.

  4. D. GCA is not excluded; assess the complete clinical picture and pursue appropriate confirmation (Best answer)

    Inflammatory markers are supportive tests with limitations.

Takeaway: Do not let a single inflammatory marker override a concerning ischemic history.

Case sources: [10] [22]

Case 22

A 21-year-old has fever, severe headache, neck stiffness, and confusion. Bacterial meningitis is suspected. Lumbar puncture is delayed because immediate imaging is indicated. What is the best action?

Show answer and explanations for case 22
  1. A. Exclude bacterial disease because no rash is present (Why this does not fit)

    A rash is not required for bacterial meningitis.

  2. B. Give only a triptan because photophobia occurs in migraine (Why this does not fit)

    The fever, meningismus, and confusion strongly indicate a secondary infectious process.

  3. C. Obtain blood samples promptly and start appropriate antibiotics without waiting for delayed CSF sampling (Best answer)

    Necessary diagnostic sequencing should not postpone treatment of suspected bacterial meningitis.

  4. D. Wait for lumbar puncture regardless of the delay (Why this does not fit)

    This can delay time-sensitive treatment.

Takeaway: When LP must wait, needed antibiotics should not.

Case sources: [11]

Case 23

A febrile adult with meningismus has CSF containing 1,500 leukocytes/µL, predominantly neutrophils, low glucose relative to serum, and increased protein. No organism has yet been identified. Which interpretation is best?

Show answer and explanations for case 23
  1. A. Normal bacterial culture would instantly exclude infection after prior antibiotics (Why this does not fit)

    Prior treatment can reduce culture yield; other tests and the clinical picture remain relevant.

  2. B. The pattern strongly supports bacterial meningitis, with microbiologic testing needed to identify the cause (Best answer)

    The CSF combination directs urgent treatment but does not specify an organism by itself.

  3. C. Pneumococcus is proved because there is no rash (Why this does not fit)

    Rash absence does not identify a bacterial species.

  4. D. Tuberculous meningitis is more likely solely because CSF glucose is low (Why this does not fit)

    Low glucose occurs in several infections, but marked neutrophilic pleocytosis in this acute febrile presentation strongly supports bacterial meningitis. Microbiology establishes the cause.

Takeaway: Use the CSF pattern to guide urgency without inventing organism certainty.

Case sources: [11]

Case 24

A 24-year-old with obesity has progressive headache, pulsatile tinnitus, brief visual dimming, and bilateral papilledema. Which investigation sequence is most appropriate?

Show answer and explanations for case 24
  1. A. Brain imaging with venous assessment, then lumbar puncture when safe to assess opening pressure and CSF (Best answer)

    This evaluates mass lesions and venous thrombosis before considering IIH.

  2. B. Diagnose IIH from body habitus alone (Why this does not fit)

    Obesity is a risk context, not a complete diagnosis.

  3. C. Perform repeated therapeutic lumbar punctures without imaging (Why this does not fit)

    Secondary causes and procedural safety need assessment first.

  4. D. Treat as tension-type headache because strength is normal (Why this does not fit)

    Papilledema requires evaluation even without limb weakness.

Takeaway: Papilledema changes the headache workup and puts vision at the center of care.

Case sources: [12]

Case 25

A young adult develops papilledema and headache several weeks after starting doxycycline. Imaging excludes a mass and venous thrombosis; CSF composition is normal and opening pressure is high. Which classification is most appropriate?

Show answer and explanations for case 25
  1. A. Idiopathic disease solely because imaging is normal (Why this does not fit)

    An identified medication association must be considered before using an idiopathic label.

  2. B. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (Why this does not fit)

    Venous thrombosis can produce this syndrome, but the stem states that venous imaging excludes it. The newly introduced implicated medicine supports secondary medication-associated intracranial hypertension.

  3. C. Chronic migraine with incidental optic disc swelling (Why this does not fit)

    Papilledema and elevated opening pressure require an intracranial-hypertension diagnosis and protection of vision. They cannot be dismissed as incidental migraine findings.

  4. D. Secondary intracranial hypertension associated with an implicated medication (Best answer)

    The exposure provides a potential cause that should be reviewed and addressed.

Takeaway: Normal imaging does not make a drug-associated pressure syndrome idiopathic.

Case sources: [12]

Case 26

A patient with confirmed IIH has persistent headache but stable visual fields. She requests weekly lumbar punctures indefinitely. Which response is most appropriate?

Show answer and explanations for case 26
  1. A. Stop visual monitoring because headache is the only current complaint (Why this does not fit)

    Vision still needs appropriate follow-up even when fields are currently stable.

  2. B. Recommend opioids as the only alternative (Why this does not fit)

    There are disease-directed and headache-specific approaches beyond opioids.

  3. C. Discuss a durable plan addressing disease drivers, headache phenotype, and visual monitoring rather than routine serial LP (Best answer)

    CSF replenishes, relief may be brief, and routine repeated LP is not recommended as long-term management.

  4. D. Agree because repeated LP is the standard permanent preventive treatment (Why this does not fit)

    Consensus guidance does not support that routine approach.

Takeaway: Long-term IIH care requires more than transient pressure relief.

Case sources: [12]

Case 27

After a facial infection, a patient develops fever, painful ophthalmoplegia, proptosis, and chemosis. Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates a filling defect in the cavernous sinus. Which diagnosis is best supported?

Show answer and explanations for case 27
  1. A. Isolated optic neuritis (Why this does not fit)

    This does not account for the venous finding or the full infectious orbital syndrome.

  2. B. Cavernous sinus thrombosis (Best answer)

    The infection-associated orbital syndrome plus direct venous imaging establishes the relevant location.

  3. C. Uncomplicated preseptal cellulitis (Why this does not fit)

    Preseptal disease does not explain a cavernous sinus filling defect and ophthalmoplegia.

  4. D. Migraine with aura (Why this does not fit)

    Migraine does not explain fever, proptosis, and demonstrated venous thrombosis.

Takeaway: Use imaging to distinguish cavernous sinus thrombosis from overlapping orbital infection.

Case sources: [13] [21]

Case 28

A 60-year-old has progressive headache and a new focal seizure. MRI shows a solitary ring-enhancing lesion. Which conclusion is justified before further specialist workup?

Show answer and explanations for case 28
  1. A. A structural lesion is present, but enhancement alone does not establish its histologic diagnosis (Best answer)

    Specialist imaging interpretation and, when indicated, tissue evaluation are needed.

  2. B. The ring alone proves glioblastoma (Why this does not fit)

    Multiple pathologies can produce ring enhancement.

  3. C. The normal examination between seizures excludes a serious lesion (Why this does not fit)

    The seizure and imaging finding remain significant.

  4. D. The lesion can be ignored because headache responds to acetaminophen (Why this does not fit)

    Analgesic response does not determine the lesion's cause or importance.

Takeaway: An imaging descriptor is not a tissue diagnosis.

Case sources: [14]

Case 29

A 51-year-old develops brief occipital pain with coughing and new imbalance. She has never had this pattern before. What is the best next approach?

Show answer and explanations for case 29
  1. A. Diagnose primary cough headache without imaging (Why this does not fit)

    The new associated neurologic symptom argues against stopping at that label.

  2. B. Diagnose cluster because the pain is brief (Why this does not fit)

    The trigger, location, and imbalance do not form a cluster syndrome.

  3. C. Treat as medication overuse without asking about medicine use (Why this does not fit)

    The stem offers no medication exposure to support that cause.

  4. D. Evaluate for a posterior fossa or craniocervical structural cause (Best answer)

    New cough headache with imbalance needs secondary-cause assessment before a primary label.

Takeaway: A cough trigger can direct attention to the posterior fossa and craniocervical junction.

Case sources: [1] [2]

Case 30

A 67-year-old has recurrent one-second electric shocks across the right cheek when brushing teeth. There is no prolonged headache or cranial autonomic pattern. Which diagnosis best fits?

Show answer and explanations for case 30
  1. A. Giant cell arteritis (Why this does not fit)

    Jaw claudication is ischemic aching with use, not brief touch-triggered electric facial pain.

  2. B. Status migrainosus (Why this does not fit)

    That requires a prolonged debilitating migraine attack, absent here.

  3. C. Trigeminal neuralgia (Best answer)

    Very brief shock-like pain triggered by innocuous facial contact is characteristic.

  4. D. Migraine without aura (Why this does not fit)

    Migraine attacks generally last hours, not isolated one-second shocks.

Takeaway: Seconds and a touch trigger distinguish neuralgic facial pain from prolonged headache.

Case sources: [2] [9]

Case 31

A patient with a prior migraine diagnosis records 18 headache days each month for four months, including 10 days with migraine features. Sumatriptan is used on 12 days monthly throughout this period. Which assessment best fits?

Show answer and explanations for case 31
  1. A. Medication overuse is impossible below 15 triptan days per month (Why this does not fit)

    The triptan threshold is generally 10 days monthly for more than three months.

  2. B. Chronic migraine with concurrent triptan-overuse headache (Best answer)

    Both the headache-frequency criteria and the triptan-day threshold are met in the stated time frame.

  3. C. Status migrainosus alone (Why this does not fit)

    The stem describes recurrent monthly headache days, not one continuous attack beyond 72 hours.

  4. D. Episodic migraine without medication overuse (Why this does not fit)

    The headache and triptan-day counts exceed the relevant thresholds.

Takeaway: Count headache days, migraine days, and acute medication days separately.

Case sources: [2]

Case 32

A patient has disabling migraine attacks despite an effective acute drug and wants prevention. She has not tried older preventive medicines. Which statement matches the 2024 American Headache Society position?

Show answer and explanations for case 32
  1. A. CGRP-targeting therapies may be considered a first-line preventive option without mandatory prior failures (Best answer)

    Treatment choice still depends on the patient and access, but the position no longer requires sequential failure of older classes.

  2. B. Every patient must fail three older classes before CGRP therapy is clinically appropriate (Why this does not fit)

    That is not the position statement's requirement.

  3. C. CGRP-targeting prevention is reserved for chronic migraine only (Why this does not fit)

    The AHS statement permits these therapies as first-line migraine prevention without that blanket restriction. Suitability still depends on the individual patient and product.

  4. D. Prevention is unnecessary whenever one acute dose sometimes works (Why this does not fit)

    Substantial disability can justify prevention despite acute treatment benefit.

Takeaway: Preventive selection should reflect current evidence and individual goals.

Case sources: [15] [1]

Case 33

A 30-year-old with well-established migraine with visual aura requests combined estrogen-progestin contraception. She does not smoke. Which counseling matches US MEC 2024?

Show answer and explanations for case 33
  1. A. Absence of smoking makes combined hormonal contraception category 1 for aura (Why this does not fit)

    Smoking is not required for the category 4 classification.

  2. B. All contraceptive methods are contraindicated in migraine with aura (Why this does not fit)

    Several nonestrogen options can be suitable after full assessment.

  3. C. Only the severity of head pain determines contraceptive eligibility (Why this does not fit)

    Aura status is an independent factor in this classification.

  4. D. Combined hormonal contraception is category 4 for migraine with aura; discuss suitable alternatives (Best answer)

    The aura-related classification applies even without smoking, while other contraceptive methods may be appropriate.

Takeaway: Ask specifically about aura during contraceptive assessment.

Case sources: [16]

Case 34

A patient with episodic migraine has a debilitating attack that has persisted for 90 hours, with no sustained remission and no new warning findings after reassessment. Previous months contained only three headache days each. Which term best describes this episode?

Show answer and explanations for case 34
  1. A. Cluster headache (Why this does not fit)

    A single prolonged 90-hour attack does not fit the usual cluster duration.

  2. B. Medication-overuse headache based on duration alone (Why this does not fit)

    Medication exposure and repeated use over months are needed; attack duration alone is insufficient.

  3. C. Status migrainosus (Best answer)

    A debilitating prolonged migraine attack beyond 72 hours fits this complication after other causes are considered.

  4. D. Chronic migraine (Why this does not fit)

    The prior frequency does not meet at least 15 headache days monthly for more than three months.

Takeaway: A prolonged attack and a high monthly headache frequency are different diagnoses.

Case sources: [2]

Case 35

A 19-year-old with fever, headache, and neck stiffness has a negative bacterial evaluation, CSF with lymphocyte predominance and preserved glucose, and a positive enterovirus CSF PCR. He is clinically stable after initial assessment. Which diagnosis is best supported?

Show answer and explanations for case 35
  1. A. Tuberculous meningitis (Why this does not fit)

    Tuberculosis can cause lymphocytic CSF, but often lowers glucose and has a different course. The compatible syndrome and positive enterovirus PCR directly support enteroviral meningitis.

  2. B. Enteroviral meningitis (Best answer)

    The organism-specific result and compatible CSF support a viral meningeal infection.

  3. C. Pneumococcal meningitis despite the positive viral PCR (Why this does not fit)

    The absent rash does not identify an organism. The microbiologic and CSF findings supplied here favor enterovirus; a clinically suspected bacterial coinfection would require its own evidence.

  4. D. Migraine with aura (Why this does not fit)

    An inflammatory CSF profile and pathogen detection are not explained by migraine.

Takeaway: Identify the cause with microbiology rather than assuming every photophobic headache is migraine.

Case sources: [11] [19]

Case 36

A 64-year-old has sudden headache, vomiting, blurred vision, and a painful red eye. Examination shows a cloudy cornea, a mid-dilated poorly reactive pupil, and very high intraocular pressure. What is the priority diagnosis?

Show answer and explanations for case 36
  1. A. Acute angle-closure crisis (Best answer)

    The ocular examination and pressure identify a vision-threatening eye emergency.

  2. B. Cluster headache (Why this does not fit)

    Tearing and orbital pain can overlap, but a cloudy cornea and markedly high pressure require a different diagnosis.

  3. C. Migraine aura (Why this does not fit)

    Aura does not explain this painful red eye with abnormal pressure and pupil findings.

  4. D. Uncomplicated tension-type headache (Why this does not fit)

    Tension-type pain does not produce these acute ocular abnormalities.

Takeaway: Inspect the eye when headache accompanies painful visual loss.

Case sources: [17]

Search Bone Wizardry

Quick links